US, China reach 'framework' of trade deal, Bessent says
Source: The Hill
10/26/25 7:58 AM ET
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that the U.S. and China will likely avoid 100 percent American tariffs on Chinese good after negotiators settled on a plan for a possible trade agreement. Bessent told NBC News Kristen Welker that after two days of negotiations with Chinese International Trade Representative Li Chenggang in Malaysia, a framework of a deal has been reached. President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to meet in South Korea on Thursday, capping off the formers five-day trip to Asia.
Earlier this month, Trump announced he would impose 100 percent tariffs on Chinese goods by Nov. 1. That came in response to Beijing requiring foreign entities to obtain a license to export any products containing over 0.1 percent of rare earth minerals, either sourced in China or manufacturing via its extraction process.
China controls roughly 70 percent of the globes rare earths.
President Trump gave me a great deal of negotiating leverage with the threat of the 100 percent tariffs, and I believe weve reached a very substantial framework that will avoid that and allow us to discuss many other things with the Chinese, Bessent told NBC.
Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/international/5573659-us-china-trade-agreement-bessent/
TRANSLATION - "Concepts of a framework of a deal".
And then this guy will come out and declare "Hold my Diet Coke" -

AnnaLee
(1,325 posts)Really time to get rid of the old and swoosh in the young. Else, how much further backwards will we go? Keep the chips out? Landlines, by law, anyone?
doc03
(38,562 posts)in the last 9 months. Then Trump blows it up the next day. Trump is a fucking moron; Canada runs an ad Trump doesn't like so he
punishes Canada by increasing the price we have to pay for Canadian products. It is insane. Every leader in the world has figured him out,
you say something good about him, and you own him.
CanonRay
(15,714 posts)It's all bullshit as usual.
A framework of a concept of a vague idea of a basic general outline of a starting point.
Sun-Moon
(220 posts)If not 100%, maybe 75 or 50% more.
I would be shocked If the status quo remains as is this November. The change in tariff rate may not happen on 11/1, but the extension of current China tariff rates expires on 11/10. And the SC is to hear oral arguments on 11/5, I believe.
Because policy is based on feelings, who knows what will happen. Now he's mad at Canada again.
Lets say the SC says his tariff increases based on IEEPA (emergency act) is unconstitutional. Great- however, that does not mean an immediate refund to all those businesses. In fact the SC could say- going forward you cant collect tariffs based on the IEEPA rules. But past money collected will not be refunded.
But
that doesnt mean the administration cant just throw these extra tariffs into a section 301 ruling.. this takes more time before it kicks in(60-90 days), but they can do it this way.
-Was this announcement made in time to make the stock markets happy?? Who is getting the rewards of a huge bump in value tomorrow?
My job is in importing - I have seen my company pay MILLIONS of dollars this year to the govt. last year we paid under 400,000.
Before dtj 1.0, we paid less than 200,000 a year.
And yes we raised our prices to cover a share of this increase because our suppliers do NOT, pay the duties.
FredGarvin
(720 posts)Insiders are going to make billions on this nonsensical market pump and dump.
China has agreed on nothing.
republianmushroom
(21,793 posts)BumRushDaShow
(162,363 posts)pwb
(12,395 posts)ever from pukes.
FredGarvin
(720 posts)China is way in the drivers seat.
Chinese leaders don't eat TACO's