Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(161,985 posts)
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 07:15 AM Saturday

Epstein trial would have been 'crapshoot', plea-deal prosecutor tells Congress

Source: The Guardian

Fri 17 Oct 2025 18.23 EDT
Last modified on Sat 18 Oct 2025 04.00 EDT


Alex Acosta, the former US attorney for the southern district of Florida who negotiated a plea deal in 2008 with Jeffrey Epstein, testified before the House oversight committee last month that going to trial would have been a “crapshoot” due to lack of cooperation from victims.

In a transcript of the six-hour interview released on Friday, Acosta, who later served in the first Trump administration as labor secretary, described the evidentiary hurdles a federal prosecution of Esptein would have faced, and told why his office turned the case over to Florida state prosecutors, which resulted in the disgraced financier pleading guilty to charges of soliciting sex from a minor.

“Ultimately, the trial was a crapshoot, and we just wanted the guy to go to jail,” Acosta told members of the oversight panel.

Questions over the government’s non-prosecution agreement with Epstein have hung heavily over the scandal, generating speculation over the presence of larger forces at work.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/17/alexander-acosta-epstein-trial

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Pachamama

(17,511 posts)
1. What a load of crap
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 07:39 AM
Saturday

That cowardly example of a prosecutor and protector of pedophiles should be disbarred.

sop

(16,521 posts)
4. Total bullshit.
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 08:07 AM
Saturday

"We just wanted the guy to go to jail." Epstein was sentenced to just 18 months in the Palm Beach County jail after "pleading guilty to state charges of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution." He served only 13 months. Epstein was allowed to leave the jail for up to 16 hours a day, six days a week, to work at his office.

Epstein also received a "non-prosecution agreement," granting Epstein and "potential co-conspirators" immunity from federal charges. This ended the ongoing FBI investigation into his sex trafficking operation.

And there was no victim consultation. Acosta violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to consult with Epstein's victims.

Scrivener7

(57,487 posts)
5. Forty girls - children at the time of their assaults - were willing to testify.
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 08:18 AM
Saturday

Acosta should go straight to hell.

hoosierspud

(189 posts)
9. A Vanity Fair article said
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 10:52 AM
Saturday

That Buckingham Palace begged the White House to sweep it under the rug, due to Prince Andrew's involvement. I think that there is some truth to that.

FakeNoose

(39,082 posts)
10. I hope someone asks Julie K. Brown what she thinks about all of this
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 11:30 AM
Saturday

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_K._Brown

Julie is the Miami Herald reporter who broke the story on Epstein's cushy deal with the state of Florida back in 2008.

After her series of news stories she later published a book that follows up with stories of many of the victims. If it weren't for the excellent work Brown did investigating Epstein and Maxwell, they would probably still be doing it even today.

republianmushroom

(21,697 posts)
11. Acosta trying to cover his ass now.
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 11:36 AM
Saturday

Unreliable witnesses, in Florida, where have I heard that before.

AZJonnie

(1,917 posts)
12. I think the actual problem is that the most sex crimes are covered under State Law rather than Federal ones
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 01:25 PM
Saturday

Let me start by saying that OF COURSE Epstein's wealth and connections played a role in the decision making for Acosta and other prosecutors. And that definitely sucks, but that's the system in which Acosta had to operate. People above quoting these large numbers of "known victims" should consider there's "only" about 15 who have ever come forward with their stories

IMHO, in assessing just how wrong Acosta's decision was, I think it makes sense to consider 2022 events. The full weight of the Federal DOJ, under Biden, was brought to bear against Ghislaine Maxwell, and many more victims had become willing to testify in the interim (don't forget that in 2008 most of them were still fairly young, there was no Miami Herald story, etc).

Yet In the end, even at that late date in 2022, after Epstein was dead and 20 years had passed, only 4 women testified against Maxwell, and prosecutors only secured ONE federal trafficking charge against Maxwell, and it was for trafficking her to Epstein.

That outcome suggests to me that whole thing was a less "federal jury friendly" than a lot of people realize, even in 2022. 2008 I'm sure would've an even less friendly set of circumstances for Federal prosecutors to bring their case.

MHO, fwiw. Acosta is still a piece of shit, though.

Justice

(7,222 posts)
14. Disagree with conclusion because no one consulted
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 02:41 PM
Saturday

With the girls who filed complaints - some 40 of them. Deal was done in secret essentially.

FakeNoose

(39,082 posts)
15. Correct-amundo! I believe one lawyer was getting the victims together on a class action suit against Epstein
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 03:13 PM
Saturday

It took a lot of footwork rounding up victims and convincing them to come in it.

But Alex Acosta beat the class-action lawyer by keeping his deal hush-hush until it was actually done with the judge and with Epstein. So no other victims except Virginia Roberts and maybe one other, were mentioned on the case. I seem to recall that even Ghislaine Maxwell was left out of it, because Epstein wanted to protect her too.

That's why the judge was lenient, he had no idea how big this was. Acosta made sure of that.

AZJonnie

(1,917 posts)
16. Show me any sort of authoritative proof that 40 girls had filed sex pest complaints against Epstein by 2008
Sat Oct 18, 2025, 04:38 PM
Saturday

and I will absolutely change my opinion on this subject. I've followed the case pretty closely since 2018 and never seen anyone claim what you are saying here.

Also I don't know that it's a standard part of criminal proceedings that the victims(s) are consulted along the way with regards to what they believe should happen to the perp, sentence-wise, and that their wishes are routinely honored. I would speculate that it is typically not the case, but again, if you have proof to the contrary I'm happy to consider it.

Bottom-line about this though, Federal prosecutors win like 97% of the time, or some such high number. The reason is because they routinely decline to prosecute unless it's a slam dunk, and most importantly, on a slam dunk on FEDERAL level charges. Solicitation of minors for sex is not a federal crime, it's a state crime. And again, look at the Maxwell case in 2022. Only 1 trafficking charge 'stuck'. Even after so much shit was publicly known, unlike 2008.

I am in NO WAY saying that he should've gotten off as lightly as he did, but I mostly blame Florida authorities for that outcome. It's not hard for me to believe Acosta judged that a federal case, on federal charges, would be a crap-shoot given what was known to him at the time.

Small consolation here though, there's no known victims who claimed they met Maxwell/Epstein after he'd been charged, so AFA anyone knows, the charges were actually enough to get him to stop doing what he was doing

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Epstein trial would have ...