Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(161,757 posts)
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 09:46 AM Tuesday

Supreme Court rejects Alex Jones' appeal of $1.4 billion defamation judgment in Sandy Hook shooting

Source: AP

Updated 9:33 AM EDT, October 14, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an appeal from conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and left in place the $1.4 billion judgment against him over his description of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting as a hoax staged by crisis actors.

The Infowars host had argued that a judge was wrong to find him liable for defamation and infliction of emotional distress without holding a trial on the merits of allegations lodged by relatives of victims of the shooting, which killed 20 first graders and six educators in Newtown, Connecticut.

The justices did not comment on their order, which they issued without even asking the families of the Sandy Hook victims to respond to Jones’ appeal. An FBI agent who responded to the shooting also sued.

Jones filed for bankruptcy in late 2022, and his lawyers told the justices that the “plaintiffs have no possible hope of collecting” the entire judgment.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-newtown-shooting-alex-jones-infowars-ddcdede90c0c8d2710c768fd0ea9946f

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court rejects Alex Jones' appeal of $1.4 billion defamation judgment in Sandy Hook shooting (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP
Does he go whine to the mob boss now? durablend Tuesday #1
Waiting for TSF to sign another Executive Order, no_hypocrisy Tuesday #2
Or bring Jones to the white house and they can sell some crypto to the public from the oval office. progressoid Tuesday #11
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court won't review Alex Jones' appeal on $1.4 billion judgment in Sandy Hook case LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #3
Sounds like Schlump ordered his "Sicks" justices to reject it. chowder66 Tuesday #4
They saw the downside Miguelito Loveless Tuesday #7
They've evolved from shouting "The end is nigh! Torchlight Tuesday #5
Some good news. republianmushroom Tuesday #6
Alex, they aren't trying to silence you because you reach "millions" of people... rubbersole Tuesday #8
Couldn't happen to a more deserving asshole. Scalded Nun Tuesday #9
20 years ago he said that a cabal of pedophiles was in charge of the deep state, and they would endeavor to take away Fil1957 Tuesday #10
And that destructive WWE-like clown faked "integrity" Justice matters. Tuesday #13
hey, alex, you perverted, lying, grifting, pathetic pos, may you receive niyad Tuesday #12
"But how can I torment grieving parents by calling them liars struggle4progress Tuesday #14
So who is going to force him to pay? RussBLib Tuesday #15
Like the Thing's trying to hide the Epstein tapes issue, SCROTUS throws a bone to the left. Wonder Why Wednesday #16

no_hypocrisy

(53,424 posts)
2. Waiting for TSF to sign another Executive Order,
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 10:01 AM
Tuesday

declaring that Jones doesn't have to pay.

At this point, it's feasible to conjecture that TSF isn't above re-writing American jurisprudence and fucking with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If he can't pardon Jones as this is a civil matter, I can see him attempting to exonerate Jones any way he can imagine.

progressoid

(52,147 posts)
11. Or bring Jones to the white house and they can sell some crypto to the public from the oval office.
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 12:34 PM
Tuesday

LetMyPeopleVote

(171,403 posts)
3. Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court won't review Alex Jones' appeal on $1.4 billion judgment in Sandy Hook case
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 10:26 AM
Tuesday

The Infowars host had warned of a “financial death penalty by fiat imposed on a media defendant whose broadcasts reach millions.”

Fabulous news!

Supreme Court won’t review Alex Jones’ appeal on .4 billion judgment in Sandy Hook case www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...

Stephen Trumbull (@smtrumbull.bsky.social) 2025-10-14T14:00:29.034Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-alex-jones-appeal-libel-infowars-rcna236691

The Supreme Court has declined to review Alex Jones’ appeal, which sought to upend the $1.4 billion judgment that the Infowars host called “the largest in American libel history.” He was sued by victims’ relatives over his lies about the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut.

The denial came Tuesday in an order list containing actions in pending appeals. It takes four justices to grant review, and most petitions are denied.

In his failed petition, Jones said the judgment “can never be paid” and that the litigation outcome is a “financial death penalty by fiat.” He said he couldn’t fairly defend himself, complaining that the Connecticut legal process lacked “meaningful appellate review” and featured “a punitive administrative Death Penalty Sanction for small discovery errors to impose liability, bypass burdens of proof, and award punitive damages.”

Jones argues that his First Amendment rights were given short shrift and that his statements were taken out of context. He said he had expressed “opinions of media excesses” when he used terms such as “hoax” and “staged,” which he said were “generally directed at the media circus, while often in the same broadcasts acknowledging that murders had in fact occurred.”

The plaintiffs in the case waived their right to file a brief opposing Jones’ petition at the high court, and the court didn’t request a response before denying his petition, suggesting no justices thought it worthy of further consideration.

This made me smile

Miguelito Loveless

(5,269 posts)
7. They saw the downside
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 11:27 AM
Tuesday

to helping Jones. Trump doesn't care since Jones hasn't offered him any money.

Torchlight

(5,890 posts)
5. They've evolved from shouting "The end is nigh!
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 10:55 AM
Tuesday

on street corners with sandwich boards to shouting it into microphones from air-conditioned cubicles. But the scam and the crank itself is as it ever was. Label it a Podcast, and just about any naive skeptic becomes a True Believer in 4 episodes or less.

rubbersole

(10,733 posts)
8. Alex, they aren't trying to silence you because you reach "millions" of people...
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 12:06 PM
Tuesday

...they're holding you accountable for being a despicable lying piece of shit who caused suffering families untold additional heartache. Money can't fix what you're responsible for.

Fil1957

(271 posts)
10. 20 years ago he said that a cabal of pedophiles was in charge of the deep state, and they would endeavor to take away
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 12:11 PM
Tuesday

our rights and freedom. He was right! He just didn't mention the part that he was on the side of the deep state pedophiles.

Justice matters.

(8,997 posts)
13. And that destructive WWE-like clown faked "integrity"
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 12:49 PM
Tuesday

Crying like a little baby in his car for money at the news the deep state pedophiles refused to release the E files.

niyad

(127,889 posts)
12. hey, alex, you perverted, lying, grifting, pathetic pos, may you receive
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 12:48 PM
Tuesday

everything you deserve.

struggle4progress

(124,921 posts)
14. "But how can I torment grieving parents by calling them liars
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 02:29 PM
Tuesday

if I'm hit with these heavy penalties?"

RussBLib

(10,259 posts)
15. So who is going to force him to pay?
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 02:35 PM
Tuesday

Limits to free speech? Where have I heard that before?

Start paying, asshole!

https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rejects Ale...