Airports say they won't play Kristi Noem shutdown video at TSA checkpoints
Source: Washington Post
Airports in Seattle, Phoenix and Westchester, New York, said they wont display a video in which Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem blames Democrats for the government shutdown and related travel delays, citing the political nature of its content.
We continue to urge bipartisan efforts to end the government shutdown and are working to find ways to support federal employees working without pay at SEA during the shutdown, a Port of Seattle spokesperson said in an email Monday. Nor will airports in Portland, Oregon, and Buffalo, according to local news reports.
The Port of Portland, which operates Portland International Airport, told The Oregonian/OregonLive that the video could violate state and federal laws that prohibit the use of public assets and employees to disseminate partisan messages.
The Transportation Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security, which runs TSA, did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday morning.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2025/10/13/kristi-noem-shutdown-video/

flamingdem
(40,711 posts)Good for a Halloween maybe
DBoon
(24,380 posts)underpants
(193,482 posts)Beartracks
(14,161 posts)But they -- laughably -- thought it would come from the left, because of course that's what rightwing media told them for years.
==============
Initech
(106,544 posts)Fuck Kristi Noem.
OMGWTF
(4,930 posts)Republicans need to go the way of their predecessor the Whigs. Evolve or go extinct.
Initech
(106,544 posts)
popsdenver
(648 posts)was just tagged for renting the "suite" cabin on an Emirates? plane for himself to travel on a political junket, for a cost of 18,000 dollars round trip...
And, all of his other execs got to fly First Class for an outrageous price for tickets......
BidenRocks
(2,383 posts)The last time I was so quick was the idiot intro to ST DS-9.
Can't stand to hear either of them.
Good on those taxpayer funded airports!
tinrobot
(11,819 posts)I mostly ignored it.
Grokenstein
(6,175 posts)Gimpyknee
(903 posts)BurnDoubt
(1,121 posts)questionseverything
(11,321 posts)littlemissmartypants
(30,179 posts)The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law that prohibits civil service employees in the executive branch of the federal government,[2] except the president and vice president,[3] from engaging in some forms of political activity. It became law on August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico.[4] It was most recently amended in 2012.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hatch-Act-United-States-1939
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hatch-Act-United-States-1939/additional-info
Hatch Act: Related Content
Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025
News Green group files Hatch Act complaints against HHS, Forest Service over partisan shutdown messaging Oct. 11, 2025, 5:35 AM ET (The Hill)
https://www.britannica.com/facts/Hatch-Act-United-States-1939
onenote
(45,726 posts)The penalties, as set out in the statute are as follows:
An employee or individual who violates section 7323 or 7324 shall be subject to
(1) disciplinary action consisting of removal, reduction in grade, debarment from Federal employment for a period not to exceed 5 years, suspension, or reprimand;
(2) an assessment of a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000; or
(3) any combination of the penalties described in paragraph (1) or (2).
littlemissmartypants
(30,179 posts)travelingthrulife
(3,521 posts)markodochartaigh
(4,331 posts)An easy way to figure out which are laws and which are suggestions is to remember:
Laws apply to Democratic politicians and suggestions apply to Republican politicians.
SleeplessinSoCal
(10,304 posts)"Dog murderer" should be tattooed on her forehead. Her stupid, made up to the max, face appears in the video that showed up on a YouTube video I watched last night.
"Get yer bony ass off my algorithm!!!" Says me.
DBoon
(24,380 posts)Is there a Noem mask available for Halloween?
SleeplessinSoCal
(10,304 posts)Apply all the makeup you can get your hands on... et voila!
progressoid
(52,147 posts)Before and after:
SleeplessinSoCal
(10,304 posts)Still, go for plastic lips for trick or treating. Makes for a spot on costume.
littlemissmartypants
(30,179 posts)Which differs from misinformation, 'M' because it constitutes the deliberate spreading of misinformation. That's straight up Propaganda, my friends.
The comments thankfully reflect that according to WAPO:
422
Comments
What are your thoughts on airports refusing to display Kristi Noem's video due to its political content?
Highlights
The comments overwhelmingly support the decision of airports to refuse displaying Kristi Noem's video, criticizing it as partisan propaganda and a potential violation of the Hatch Act. Many commenters express relief that such political content is not being shown in airports, fearing it could incite conflict among travelers. There is a strong sentiment against the use of taxpayer money for what is perceived as government propaganda, with some commenters drawing parallels to authoritarian regimes. The decision is seen as a small but significant act of resistance against the current administration's practices.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2025/10/13/kristi-noem-shutdown-video/
AI generated
❤️ RESIST!! ✊️
Cha
(315,031 posts)Huge.... Mahalo, pants!
littlemissmartypants
(30,179 posts)

RESIST!! ✊️
Cha
(315,031 posts)Dog Killing Big fucking *****.
calimary
(88,088 posts)Shes best put on Ignore, and KEPT there.
LetMyPeopleVote
(171,403 posts)Remember when the DHS secretary starred in taxpayer-financed ads, which resembled political propaganda, earlier this year? Now, theres a sequel.
Attention Whore Krusti Noone needs more attention!
— Tabby (@tabbys-corner.bsky.social) 2025-10-13T19:11:55.487Z
Kristi Noem stars in partisan video about the shutdown, to be shown in airports www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/kristi-noem-stars-partisan-video-shutdown-shown-airports-rcna237369
Several months later, the video appears to have a sequel. The Hill reported:
A new video featuring Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem will reportedly play at airports across the U.S. as the Trump administration seeks to cast blame for the lapse in government funding on Democrats. The short video, first reported by Fox News, shows Noem warning viewers about possible changes to airport operations due to Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers not receiving pay since the shutdown entered its second week.
A spokesperson for the Cabinet agency confirmed that the video was poised to begin airing in American airports.
A new Noem video is being played at airports trashing Democrats.
— Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) 2025-10-11T00:45:09.954Z
.....In practice, however, Noem used the opportunity to push an overtly partisan message, blaming congressional Democrats for refusing to fund the federal government. She concluded: Our hope is that Democrats will soon recognize the importance of opening the government.
Or put another way, after releasing one Noem ad that looked an awful lot like taxpayer-financed propaganda, the homeland security secretary did it again with the latter including even more brazen partisanship.
I suspect that Rachel may mention this tonight
Skittles
(168,130 posts)where the fuck is DOGE on this bullshit???
usonian
(21,509 posts)
Callie1979
(967 posts)kacekwl
(8,685 posts)regime. Good on them.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,267 posts)It really does live up to the slogan "America's Friendliest Airport."
summer_in_TX
(3,872 posts)The story of how and why airports are not playing Kristi Noem's propaganda piece is encouraging.
https://substack.com/@thejackhopkins/note/c-166094104
On the surface its a minor bureaucratic tussle. One political stunt grounded by red tape.
But scratch deeper and you see something worth celebrating: institutional antibodies kicking in.
For years, weve watched norms erode laws bent agencies politicized truth treated like a negotiable item.
So when an entire layer of civil servants airport authorities and legal officers refused to cross a line that was democracys immune system at work.
They didnt riot.
They didnt grandstand.
They just enforced the rules that keep public infrastructure from becoming campaign machinery.
Thats not resistance theater. Thats professional integrity.
highplainsdem
(58,665 posts)gfarber
(125 posts)At Sea-Tac, they made it quite clear,
No partisan vids will play here.
Though flights may be late,
They won't take the bait
They'd rather stay neutral than smear.
In Phoenix, they gave it a pass,
Noem's blame-game just wouldnt amass.
They said with a frown,
"Let's cool the shutdown
Our concourse won't echo that sass."
New Yorks Westchester wont play the tape,
Though travelers may need escape.
Too hot, they all said,
To pump through our thread
We're keeping things fair in this scape.
Now Portland, as cool as they come,
Said Politics? No, we want none.
They cited the laws,
And partisan flaws
And shut off the screen with aplomb.
In Buffalo, calm in the storm,
Theyve chosen to break from the norm.
No messages skewed,
No DHS feud
Just keeping the peace is their form.
TSA and Homeland stayed mum,
As questions from pressrooms did come.
No answers, no spin,
Just silence within
While airports said, We wont play dumb.