Judge uses Hamilton quote as she slams Trump's grasp on reality
Source: Raw Story
October 11, 2025 10:35AM ET
A federal judge on Friday night released her full opinion justifying an earlier decision to block President Donald Trump from deploying Texas National Guard troops in Chicago and she even went so far as to question his administrations grasp on reality.
In her ruling, Judge April Perry began by citing a lengthy quote from the Federalist Papers in which Alexander Hamilton addressed concerns that a tyrannical US president would use a militia from one state to invade and occupy another state. After giving the matter brief consideration, Hamilton dismissed fears about a would-be tyrant carrying out such a scheme on the grounds that it is impossible to believe that they would employ such preposterous means to accomplish their designs.
And yet, Perry noted, this exact scenario is one that the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago claim is happening right now, as they argue that National Guard troops from both Illinois and Texas have been deployed to Illinois because the president of the United States wants to punish state elected officials whose policies are different from his own.
Perry went on to consider circumstances in which the president may federalize the National Guard, and concluded that the administrations case for sending the National Guard to Chicago did not meet any of them.
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/judge-uses-hamilton-quote-to-smash-trump-s/
Link to RULING (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilnd.487574/gov.uscourts.ilnd.487574.70.0_1.pdf
RELATED - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143545967

LearnedHand
(5,059 posts)
EDIT: I thought the headline meant she quoted in the rooms where it happened or something.
BumRushDaShow
(161,644 posts)that we forget about his many writings that comprised the Federalist Papers (although the musical did touch on that ) -
Paladin
(31,778 posts)tavernier
(14,006 posts)until the SCOTUS comes to the rescue of their creepy creation, an American president that neither Hamilton nor any other forefather would recognize.
Gimpyknee
(903 posts)flashman13
(1,636 posts)cstanleytech
(27,979 posts)J_William_Ryan
(3,065 posts)conservatives as advocates of small government, as advocates of states rights, and as opponents of Federal tyranny and overreach.
Instead, conservatives are advocates of a tyrannical president who violates states rights and who engages in Federal excess and overreach lawless, un-Constitutional, meritless Federal tyranny and authoritarianism.