DC Comics won't support generative AI: 'not now, not ever'
Source: The Verge
DC Comics president and publisher Jim Lee said that the company will not support AI-generated storytelling or artwork, assuring fans that its future will remain rooted in human creativity. Not now, not ever, as long as [SVP, general manager] Anne DePies and I are in charge, Lee said during his panel at New York Comic Con on Wednesday, likening concerns around AI dominating future creative industries to the Millennium bug scare and NFT hype.
People have an instinctive reaction to what feels authentic. We recoil from what feels fake. Thats why human creativity matters, said Lee. AI doesnt dream. It doesnt feel. It doesnt make art. It aggregates it.
While DC has a longstanding policy that requires all artwork to be original and authentically produced by artists, the company has faced several scandals over the suspected use of generative AI in variant comic book covers. Backlash from people who oppose the technology over concerns that it will replace the work of writers and artists pressured DC to replace the suspected covers, and likely contributed to the company taking a firmer stance against using generative AI in future projects.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.theverge.com/news/797540/dc-comics-jim-lee-no-generative-ai-pledge
More from Gizmodo:
https://gizmodo.com/dc-comics-jim-lee-generative-ai-new-york-comic-con-2000670254
Lee expanded upon his declaration, saying what DC Comics does is rooted in humanity.
Its that fragile, beautiful connection between imagination and emotion that fuels our media. The stuff that makes our universe come alive, he said. Its the imperfect mind, the creative risk, the hand-drawn gesture that no algorithm can replicate.
He continued: When I draw, I make mistakes. A lot of them. But thats the point. The smudge, the rough lines, the hesitationthats me in the work. Thats my journey. Thats what makes it come alive.
-snip-
Lees words come downwind of the comic book industry putting its foot down on its stance on generative AI. Key among them is Dark Horse Comics, which, last year, released a statement saying it does not support the use of AI-generated material and instead supports the human creative professionals.
-snip-
This is a much more ethical and rational stand than that of some who imagine they're creating "fine art" welcoming the use of AI.

Ponietz
(4,088 posts)sakabatou
(45,392 posts)"I need a prompt for a story."
"I need an image of this idea because I can't visualize it clearly."
Hell, I used a photograph as reference to one piece of art I made.
highplainsdem
(58,575 posts)Polybius
(20,954 posts)In fact, one just told me that my parking sensors (they tell and show me when I'm too close to the curb, a car, or other objects) will make me dumb and lazy.
I can live with that for convenience.
highplainsdem
(58,575 posts)Polybius
(20,954 posts)twodogsbarking
(16,158 posts)
highplainsdem
(58,575 posts)sakabatou
(45,392 posts)highplainsdem
(58,575 posts)sakabatou
(45,392 posts)A single word will do. Doesn't need to be a sentence. Just a word.
If I can look at a photograph, and come up with an original drawing based the picture, would that make me less imaginative? Less creative?
highplainsdem
(58,575 posts)spoonfeed you ideas.
When I first started reading about people using AI for writing, nearly three years ago, one of the first AI users I read about admitted that she'd already discovered that the more she used AI, the more her own subconscious checked out of the writing process, making her more dependent on the AI tool.
sakabatou
(45,392 posts)I've seen lists which had about 50 or so words, and the challenge was to write a story based on one of the words.
Wild blueberry
(7,950 posts)Thank you.