'Idiocracy': Trump Aide Mocked For Sharing Graph on Far-Left Versus Far-Right Violence
Source: MEDIAite
Sep 29th, 2025, 3:55 pm

Screenshot via Axios
White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson sparked a bevy of mockery over the weekend when she shared a graph from Axios highlighting the increase of left-wing violence this year, but that also showed the long-running trend of right-wing violence far outpacing all other types. Jackson shared the Axios article and wrote, Democrats, calling your political opponents Nazis has consequences. Study: Left-wing terrorism climbs to 30-year high.
The Axios article began by noting, Halfway through 2025, attacks by far-left extremists outpaced far-right violence for the first time in more than three decades, according to new research from the Center for Strategic & International Studies. The report added:
Why it matters: Americas domestic terrorism landscape has undergone a remarkable inversion since President Trump took office, as his policies have eased grievances on the far right while intensifying anger on the far left.
Far-right violence has historically been more frequent and more lethal, but plunged dramatically over the first six months of 2025.
Critics were quick to blast Jackson on X. Independent journalist Arieh Kovler shared her post and noted, The White House Deputy Press Secretary looked at this graph and thought those grey bars are totally fine, everyone will understand that only the yellow ones are a problem.
Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/idiocracy-trump-aide-mocked-for-sharing-graph-on-far-left-versus-far-right-violence/
Link to tweet
@ariehkovler
·
Follow
The White House Deputy Press Secretary looked at this graph and thought "those grey bars are totally fine, everyone will understand that only the yellow ones are a problem".
Image
1:35 PM · Sep 28, 2025

Be Leave On
(356 posts)The "Center for Strategic & International Studies" study quoted by Axios saying left leaning violence has spiked sounds suspicious, maybe even invented, to me.
chia
(2,699 posts)Aimee in OKC
(169 posts)*****
They also make the distinction that left-wing violence is far less lethal than right-wing violence.
Old Crank
(6,368 posts)Kirk and this past weekend. That would put the bars even.
Any data on what is considered violence?
Irish_Dem
(77,149 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,462 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 30, 2025, 11:21 AM - Edit history (1)
based on a somewhat different chart (Figure 3 in the CSIS report). https://www.csis.org/analysis/left-wing-terrorism-and-political-violence-united-states-what-data-tells-us
[Link edited to correct errant punctuation]
The opening remark of the report reads: In recent years, the United States has seen an increase in the number of left-wing terrorism attacks and plots, although such violence has risen from very low levels and remains much lower than historical levels of violence carried out by right-wing and jihadist attackers.
Another chart in the CSIS report points out in clear terms the real difference in scale between Left and Right (Figure 4 in the SCIS report).
The MAGA world considers anyone calling them fascist to be a terrorist. It has never acknowledged the verbal or literal violence of its own adherents to be terror as such. It is always excused as 1st amendment expression like the January 6 assault on Congress.
I suspect that previous FBI reports on domestic terror identifying RW extremist groups as the major threat would strongly disagree with the AXIOS chart presentation.
IMO any remarks to the effect of a 2025 fall off in RW terror are a result of the change in FBI leadership, and political influence on how RW terror is reported and pursued, rather than the facts as we can observe them.
werdna
(1,173 posts)- I get PAGE NOT FOUND. just fyi.
BumRushDaShow
(162,579 posts)The graph (apparently from Axios) looks like it is a flip of the CSIS one, which has the RW instances on the top vs on the bottom, and removing the other categories so they just have LW vs RW.
Here is the CSIS one -

IbogaProject
(5,301 posts)And Jihadists might as well be GOP, anti women's rights, antiabortion etc.
BumRushDaShow
(162,579 posts)vs "RW" and "LW" which appear to be referencing "domestic".
But I was basically pointing out that Axios apparently took the CSIS data and generated their own graph with just 2 categories, and flipped the RW & LW data on their plot as a reverse of how CSIS did theirs.
FakeNoose
(39,228 posts)I mean, with only one or two exceptions, the right/conservative/GOP groups have been the main instigators of terrorism in the US.
travelingthrulife
(3,695 posts)These monsters are just attributing the stuff MAGA does to liberals.
RussBLib
(10,278 posts)...before any evidence exists, right-wingers just automatically claim "left-wing radicals" for the assaults. Totally irresponsible. Totally predictable.
https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1
Bob_in_VA
(119 posts)From the CSIS report:
From 1994 through 2000, there was an average of 0.6 left-wing incidents annually; in the following decade, that figure doubled to 1.3 a year. Numbers began to grow substantially, however, in 2016, and from 2016 to 2024, they averaged 4.0 a year. Through July 4, 2025 (thus excluding the Kirk attack), there were five left-wing attacks or plots, which sets a trajectory for a record-breaking year in the last 30 years.
Another question - what does the killing of Charlie Kirk have to do with left wing violence? The Robinson kid certainly wasn't a lefty by any standards. Middle of the road at best. From what has come out so far, his act was personal, not political.
BWdem4life
(2,827 posts)As it always takes time to accurately compile the data for the current year.
Otherwise, fuck Axios and fuck anyone unable to note the overall reality.