The F.B.I. Is Using Polygraphs to Test Officials' Loyalty
Source: NYT
Typically, the F.B.I. has turned to polygraph tests to sniff out employees who might have betrayed their country or shown they cannot be trusted with secrets.
Since Kash Patel took office as the director of the F.B.I., the bureau has significantly stepped up the use of the lie-detector test, at times subjecting personnel to a question as specific as whether they have cast aspersions on Mr. Patel himself.
In interviews and polygraph tests, the F.B.I. has asked senior employees whether they have said anything negative about Mr. Patel, according to two people with knowledge of the questions and others familiar with similar accounts. In one instance, officials were forced to take a polygraph as the agency sought to determine who disclosed to the news media that Mr. Patel had demanded a service weapon, an unusual request given that he is not an agent. The number of officials asked to take a polygraph is in the dozens, several people familiar with the matter said, though it is unclear how many have specifically been asked about Mr. Patel.
The use of the polygraph, and the nature of the questioning, is part of the F.B.I.s broader crackdown on news leaks, reflecting, to a degree, Mr. Patels acute awareness of how he is publicly portrayed. The moves, former bureau officials say, are politically charged and highly inappropriate, underscoring what they describe as an alarming quest for fealty at the F.B.I., where there is little tolerance for dissent. Disparaging Mr. Patel or his deputy, Dan Bongino, former officials say, could cost people their job.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/10/us/politics/fbi-polygraph-kash-patel.html

RockRaven
(17,623 posts)Pseudo science for pseudo professionals.
tanyev
(47,111 posts)😠
LudwigPastorius
(12,922 posts)Who would have thought that this guy was paranoid?
DrFunkenstein
(8,790 posts)Polygraph tests to check political loyalty? Sounds like the "Outer Party" of Ingsoc.
-misanthroptimist
(1,388 posts)...simply by offering the officials a nice cup of tea, and then just read the leaves.
Cheezoholic
(3,100 posts)James48
(4,874 posts)Arent you duty-bound to resign?
I know I took my oaths very seriously, and an employer like that is not preserving, protecting or defending the U.S. Constitution.
Id resign by now.
fujiyamasan
(416 posts)As youd imagine he takes his oath seriously and we only discuss whatever is public.
But he sees the direction the country is taking and is not happy about it.
The country is in the process of losing many decent and dedicated public servants. Many could have made a lot more money in the private sector, but decided to serve their country in other ways. This administration will find a way to drive them out because as Trump said it himself, theyre suckers and losers.
DrFunkenstein
(8,790 posts)But honestly, having people taking a lie detector to see if they have "cast aspersions" on the director sounds like an episode of The Office.
thought crime
(494 posts)Also, Don Bongino complaining about having an office job: I stare at these four walls all day in DC, you know, by myself, divorced from my wife. Not divorced, but I mean, separated. And it's hard. We love each other, but its hard to be apart.
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
muriel_volestrangler
(104,098 posts)you've probably lost all higher brain function. So this is a test of how well the employees can lie.