New Hampshire judge to pause Trump's birthright citizenship order
Last edited Thu Jul 10, 2025, 11:03 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: AP
Updated 10:55 AM EDT, July 10, 2025
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) A federal judge in New Hampshire said Thursday he will certify a class action lawsuit including all children who will be affected by President Donald Trumps executive order ending birthright citizenship and issue a preliminary injunction blocking it.
Judge Joseph LaPlante announced his decision after an hour-long hearing and said a written order will follow. The order will include a seven-day stay to allow for appeal, he said.
The class is slightly narrower than that sought by the plaintiffs, who originally included parents as plaintiffs.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of a pregnant woman, two parents and their infants. Its among numerous cases challenging Trumps January order denying citizenship to those born to parents living in the U.S. illegally or temporarily. The plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and others.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/birthright-citizenship-classaction-lawsuit-055227e3f219fd890c78cd21c89fd5d0
Article updated.
Original article/headline -
Updated 12:01 AM EDT, July 10, 2025
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) A federal judge in New Hampshire will hear arguments Thursday on whether to certify a class-action lawsuit that would include every baby affected by President Donald Trumps restrictions on birthright citizenship.
The lawsuit, filed on behalf of a pregnant woman, two parents and their infants, is among numerous cases challenging Trumps January order denying citizenship to those born to parents living in the U.S. illegally or temporarily. Represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and others, the plaintiffs are seeking to have their case certified as a class action and to block implementation of the order while litigation continues.
Tens of thousands of babies and their parents may be exposed to the orders myriad harms in just weeks and need an injunction now, lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote in court documents filed Tuesday.
At issue is the Constitutions 14th Amendment, which states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. The Trump administration says the phrase subject to the jurisdiction thereof means the U.S. can deny citizenship to babies born to women in the country illegally, ending what has been seen as an intrinsic part of U.S. law for more than a century.

bucolic_frolic
(51,383 posts)Heard the phrase many times, never thought about it much.
Almost sounds like you're not a citizen if you're not on US soil. All of us. Yet we are subject to US jurisdiction outside the US. The legal system can reach far and wide outside the US to detain us, pull our passport, request foreign governments to extradite us, if we are not in good standing as a holder of US passport.
I don't think they have a leg to stand on here.
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,212 posts)Bayard
(25,951 posts)Including the Supremes.
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
LetMyPeopleVote This message was self-deleted by its author.
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,212 posts)The Supreme Court left open a door to challenging the executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The ACLU walked right through.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/birthright-citizenship-class-action-trump-executive-order-rcna218023
A federal judge in New Hampshire granted class-action status to a lawsuit seeking to protect babies who would be denied birthright citizenship by the Trump administration and granted a temporary block of the order restricting birthright citizenship from going into effect throughout the country. The suit was brought on behalf of a pregnant immigrant, immigrant parents and their infants and had sought class action status for all babies around the country who would be affected by Trumps executive order and their parents.
NBC News report added that the judge in the case ordered a preliminary injunction temporarily blocking Trumps order from going into effect, but stayed his order for seven days, allowing the government time to appeal which it almost certainly will.
The ruling in the case was issued by U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Laplante, who was appointed to the federal bench by George W. Bush.
While readers mightve seen headlines about a related Supreme Court ruling last month, as my MSNBC colleague Jordan Rubin explained, the justices highly controversial opinion focused largely on the judiciarys authority, not on the underlying constitutional issue and the legality of Trumps order itself.
Within hours of the Supreme Courts ruling, which left open the possibility of using class action lawsuits to challenge the White Houses policy, the ACLU filed just such a case. On Thursday morning, it scored a key victory. Watch this space.