Judge dismisses criminal case against New York Mayor Eric Adams
Source: CNBC
Published Wed, Apr 2 2025 9:38 AM EDT Updated 11 Min Ago
A federal judge on Wednesday dismissed the criminal corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, nearly two months after the Trump administration controversially sought to drop the case. The case was dismissed with prejudice, which means the Department of Justice is permanently barred from resurrecting the five-count indictment against Adams based on the same evidence used in the case in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.
The DOJ originally asked District Court Judge Dale Ho to toss the case without prejudice, after seven federal prosecutors among them the acting Manhattan U.S. Attorney quit in protest over the departments demand that they file that request. A dismissal without prejudice would have allowed the DOJ to refile charges against the Democrat in the future if the department chose to do so.
Ho, in his order on Wednesday, denied the DOJs request, writing that dismissing the case without prejudice would create the unavoidable perception that the Mayors freedom depends on his ability to carry out the immigration enforcement priorities of the administration.
The judge also said it would create the perception that Adams, who is seeking re-election this year, might be more beholden to the demands of the federal government than to the wishes of his own constituents.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/02/eric-adams-case-dismissed-new-york-trump-doj.html
He's toast regardless. They're not going to reelect him.
Article updated.
Previous article -
A federal judge on Wednesday dismissed the criminal corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, nearly two months after the Trump administration controversially sought to drop the case. The case was dismissed "with prejudice," which means the Department of Justice is permanently barred from resurrecting the five-count indictment against Adams based on the same evidence used in the case in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.
The DOJ originally asked District Court Judge Dale Ho to toss the case "without prejudice," after seven federal prosecutors quit in protest over the department's demand that they file that request. A dismissal without prejudice would have allowed the DOJ to refile charges against the Democrat in the future if the department chose to do so.
Ho, in his order on Wednesday, denied the DOJ's request, writing that dismissing the case without prejudice "would create the unavoidable perception that the Mayor's freedom depends on his ability to carry out the immigration enforcement priorities of the administration.
The judge also said it would create the perception that Adams, who is seeking re-election this year, "might be more beholden to the demands of the federal government than to the wishes of his own constituents."
Original article -
A federal judge on Wednesday dismissed the criminal corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams.
The case was dismissed "with prejudice," which means the Department of Justice is permanently barred from resurrecting the charges against Adams based on the same evidence used in the case.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

Irish_Dem
(67,214 posts)republianmushroom
(19,279 posts)And no one is above the law, just a myth.
Irish_Dem
(67,214 posts)republianmushroom
(19,279 posts)Part of their creed of family values and the law and order party, yes, the good ife.
Irish_Dem
(67,214 posts)The GOP uses the law to protect and enrich themselves and to punish and control everyone else.
Bengus81
(8,532 posts)Irish_Dem
(67,214 posts)We follow the law, go to work every day, in some cases risk our lives, for peanuts.
MLWR
(246 posts)this means that Krasnov can't use this as leverage to extort Adams.
no_hypocrisy
(50,949 posts)Got him to get Adams out of criminal trial and without paying for the favor.
OTOH, TSF will likely seek "retribution" on Adams by finding SOMETHING in the City to deny federal funds to.
dutch777
(4,172 posts)travelingthrulife
(1,948 posts)dutch777
(4,172 posts)...other misdeeds at least in the eyes of NY Dems I would think. So in a state like NY, he ain't gonna be a candidate for Governor or Senator, so other than teaching others the art of being a backroom fixer, where does he go politically? Of course, maybe in NY Backroom Fixer is a job that pays well.
BumRushDaShow
(149,992 posts)NYC mayoral races are ALWAYS "drama". Always. And that goes way way back, including this guy -
(who has an airport named after him )
Andrew Cuomo is gonna demolish everyone in the Democratic primary, and then coast to victory against Curtis Sliwa.
brush
(59,419 posts)He'll be primaried and lose.
LetMyPeopleVote
(160,892 posts)Ocelot II
(123,950 posts)to use the possibility of prosecution as leverage. The original deal was dismissal without prejudice so they could hang it over Adams' head, get him to cooperate with Trump's deportations, but the judge wouldn't play:
HoldenTheDemocrat
(21 posts)This dismissal, while a procedural victory for Mayor Adams, underscores the critical need for an independent judiciary and transparent governance. Judge Ho's decision to dismiss "with prejudice" rightly protects against the politicization of justice, a core principle of our democracy. The Trump administration's initial attempt to dismiss "without prejudice" raised serious concerns about potential political interference, especially given the timing near an election.
It's crucial to acknowledge the seven federal prosecutors who resigned in protest. Their principled stand against potential political overreach highlights the importance of ethical conduct within the Department of Justice. We must remain vigilant against any attempts to undermine the integrity of our legal system.
While the criminal case is dismissed, the underlying allegations of corruption and potential conflicts of interest remain a matter of public concern. According to data from the Center for Responsive Politics, in the 2024 election cycle, special interest groups and large donors contributed significantly to political campaigns, raising questions about influence and transparency. We must continue to advocate for campaign finance reform to reduce the potential for corruption and ensure elected officials prioritize the public good over special interests.
Furthermore, Judge Ho's concerns about the perception of mayoral dependence on federal immigration enforcement priorities are valid. The Democratic Party platform emphasizes comprehensive immigration reform that protects human rights and promotes pathways to citizenship. We must uphold these values and ensure that local governance is not unduly influenced by federal agendas.
Moving forward, we must focus on strengthening ethics oversight and accountability mechanisms. According to a 2023 report by the Government Accountability Office, local government ethics commissions often lack sufficient resources and independence to effectively investigate corruption allegations. We must advocate for increased funding and stronger oversight powers to ensure that public officials are held accountable.
Let us celebrate the protection of judicial independence while continuing to demand transparency and accountability from all elected officials. We must work to safeguard our democratic institutions from political interference and ensure that justice is served fairly and impartially.
LetMyPeopleVote
(160,892 posts)This ruling basically calls out the trump DOJ for wanting to use this case to blackmail Adams
Link to tweet

Montauk6
(8,985 posts)"GIT ON THE TRUCK, BOY!"
riversedge
(74,793 posts)electric_blue68
(20,603 posts)BumRushDaShow
(149,992 posts)unless more of his "past" gets him slimed come election time.
electric_blue68
(20,603 posts)I don't think I like it much.