Special counsel says obstruction charge against Donald Trump in January 6 case should stand
Source: CNN Politics
Published 11:00 AM EDT, Wed October 16, 2024
CNN Special counsel Jack Smith told a federal judge on Wednesday that the Supreme Courts decision limiting some obstruction charges against those who stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, should not apply to Donald Trump in the election subversion case against the former president.
One primary reason the obstruction charge against Trump should stand, prosecutors argue, is that unlike in the case involving a rioter that was before the Supreme Court Trump is directly accused of creating false evidence though the plot to insert fake electors in the certification process.
Additionally, the special counsel said in a court filing, Trumps pressure campaign against then-Vice President Mike Pence and other legislators to certify fraudulent electoral college votes link the defendants actions on January 6 directly to his efforts to corruptly obstruct the certification proceeding.
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court found that obstruction charges brought by prosecutors against many alleged rioters could not stand unless the individual obstructed the Electoral College certification proceeding by impairing physical documents and other similar and direct acts of obstruction. Trump is arguing the ruling should result in Judge Tanya Chutkan throwing out the case against him. The defendants supplement ignores entirely that the superseding indictment includes allegations that involve the creation of false evidence, prosecutors wrote Wednesday, namely, the fraudulent electoral certificates.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/16/politics/special-counsel-trump-january-6-response/index.html
Link to FILING (PDF viewer) - https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25219046-smith-response-to-trump-motion
Link to FILING (PDF) - https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25219046/smith-response-to-trump-motion.pdf
BoRaGard
(2,486 posts)Somebody will say
America needs a cosmic enema to clear out the crap.
erronis
(16,639 posts)Well, I guess the Proud Boyz will be receptive - standing by, Sir!
Tarzanrock
(391 posts)Rock solid legal ground -- like the Rock of Gibralter.
BootinUp
(48,551 posts)Tarzanrock
(391 posts)You're going to prison, Turd. There's no viable legal defenses to the criminal charges brought against you in the superceding indictment. It's best for you to change your plea to an insanity defense or plead "nolo contendre" and throw yourself at the "mercy" of the Court -- and apologize to the Nation for your treasonous criminal conduct. Then, serve your 20 years in Federal Prison in remorseful silence and repentenance. The injured American people deserve no less.
erronis
(16,639 posts)Bayard
(23,855 posts)When you send an angry mob to attack the Capitol to halt the vote count.