Manchin circulates proposal to reverse Schumer on dress code
Source: The Hill
Centrist Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) is circulating a proposal to reestablish the Senates dress code, which Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) loosened over the weekend to allow senators to wear whatever they want on the Senate floor, according to senators familiar with the proposal.
One person familiar with the resolution said it would essentially return the Senate dress code to what it was last week, which required senators to wear coats and ties or business attire when on the Senate floor.
Ive signed it, said one senator, who explained it would define what the dress code is.
Schumers decision appeared aimed at catering to first-term Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), whose hoodie was a signature look on the campaign trail in 2022 and who wore a dark short-sleeved collared shirt and dark shorts to work Thursday.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4216746-manchin-circulates-proposal-to-reverse-schumer-on-dress-code/

leftieNanner
(16,055 posts)I like the professional dress code.
Don't think Senators should be able to wear gym clothes or other casual wear in the Capital.
Hope22
(4,197 posts)Then I think we can talk about people who dont dress in a conventional manner. The person at the heart of this conversation was elected wearing a sweatshirt and shorts! Its not like he recently invented his style.
Response to leftieNanner (Reply #1)
DemocraticPatriot This message was self-deleted by its author.
leftieNanner
(16,055 posts)But I think respect for the office is important too. Although there are lots of well dressed idiots in both houses of Congress.
Response to leftieNanner (Reply #9)
DemocraticPatriot This message was self-deleted by its author.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)Its simply disrespectful to the office. Just as Trump was disrespectful to HIS office on so many occasions; which we all pointed out here. Why SHOULD Fetterman get to show up like he did the other day? Having a stroke doesnt impair your ability to choose a wardrobe.
Dont forget, Jim Jordan has been slammed here many times for simply not wearing a coat over his suit.
Thanks for articulating my thoughts exactly!
PatSeg
(51,070 posts)Jim Jordan without his jacket on the floor has driven me nuts, so I'm not about to overlook Fetterman's hoodie and shorts.
Seeking Serenity
(3,240 posts)Fetterman can wear whatever the heck he likes AND we condemn and call for Jim Jordan's resignation for not dressing appropriately.
Democrats have GOT to quit playing THEIR game by THEIR rules. One set of rules, lightly applied, for us, another set, strictly applied, for them. It's called 21st century politics.
PatSeg
(51,070 posts)They are the ones who believe in two sets of rules - one for them and another for Democrats. I believe one shows their respect for the office by their words, deeds, and appearance on the floor of the Senate or House, regardless of their party.
Seeking Serenity
(3,240 posts)Then let's fight fire with greater fire. This is all about WINNING, not playing by "don't hit a man when he's down," Marquis of Queensbury rules with one hand tied behind our backs.
As former AG Eric Holder said, when they go low, we KICK them!
PatSeg
(51,070 posts)I'm all for getting a bit more confrontational and aggressive, but I don't ever want to be like them. We need to improve our messaging, which I feel like we are doing, and call them out every time they are dishonest and unethical. And we need to quit apologizing for being on the right side of history, which I also feel like we are doing more often.
BlueIn_W_Pa
(842 posts)and I'm here in PA with Fetterman.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)hlthe2b
(111,588 posts)They are not being "petty," but expressing their opinion--even while many may disagree.
sybylla
(8,655 posts)dressing up in a suit and wearing your christianity on your sleeve while doing nothing to respect the office or honor Jesus is okay for pukes but doing real work and dressing for a long day of it while getting criticized for it isn't petty.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)By hating on foreigners like he did.
And promoting divisiveness like he did.
And being disrespectful to women like he was (had someone else tell his mama she wasn't his family so he could keep partying).
Oh--and they all want to harm all the people who disagree with them forever, just like their two-bit demigod did.
Sounds to me like they honor their deity just fine by emulating him so well.
marybourg
(13,550 posts)on you, rather than on your position. Theres too much of that here on DU lately.
PatSeg
(51,070 posts)I am frequently critical of some republicans for how they dress on the floor, especially in the House, so it would be hypocritical of me to give Fetterman a pass. I love him, but his attire is disrespectful to the office.
Response to leftieNanner (Reply #1)
DemocraticPatriot This message was self-deleted by its author.
leftieNanner
(16,055 posts)Response to leftieNanner (Reply #11)
DemocraticPatriot This message was self-deleted by its author.
hlthe2b
(111,588 posts)Grins
(8,925 posts)...to beat Democrats in the media.
There was no reason for him to do this, and fer' Chris' sake - THE OPTICS!
It allowed the kleig lights to come off Republicans and onto Democrats.
"Can't anybody here play this game?" - Casey Stengel, 1962
Novara
(6,115 posts)A change to casual wasn't necessary, IMO.
I mean, for fuck's sake, Tammy Duckworth doesn't have legs and she dresses professionally. Why was it necessary to paint a huge culture war target on the Dems' backs in the first place?
Miguelito Loveless
(5,233 posts)As are the people stealing my wages, poisoning my air/water, gouging me for health care, sticking me with extortionate bank fess, and numerous other white collar crimes.
Nixie
(17,852 posts)His appearance takes the place of anything he says. I gasp when I see him so casual.
It makes me wonder what his wife has to say about it. If that was my husband, I would advise against his wearing gym clothes to the senate. I havent seen any place of employment where gym clothes are seen like that except athletes, of course. Its just common sense. He should always be elevating himself, not detracting.
summer_in_TX
(3,856 posts)My father-in-law had a stroke that left him a paraplegic. He occasionally wore a suit still, but he had a wife right there to help him manage. Otherwise he was mostly in loungewear.
leftieNanner
(16,055 posts)Thank you.
Deuxcents
(24,275 posts)elias7
(4,229 posts)DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)I'd much more like to see him OUT of the house,
and he can wear whatever the fuck he wants on his way out!
How they VOTE, is much more important than WHAT THEY WEAR....
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)nevermind..... speaking the truth here might earn my a "hide"!
JAJAJAJAJAA
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)and does not seem in line with your previously expressed public sentiments about
bringing us together and meeting in the middle, blah blah blah....
Obviously Senator ManSinema is threatened by what other senators wear,
unless it is another former Democrat who tries to dress like Madonna, but fails.....
Guess he didn't have enough to do this week...
PortTack
(35,762 posts)The back. Thinks hes the big man on campus, saying he may run for president under the no labels Ticket, says he doesnt support the president. Seems a suit didnt improve his politics or help the American ppl.
So Fetterman doesnt want to wear a suit
.so, give 20 honest Fettermans without a suit to some Ahole that thinks the suit makes the man
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)It's ok, Manchinsinema, NOBODY wants to see you in shorts!
JI7
(92,733 posts)Botany
(75,456 posts)With his shit coal and dirty power plant in Grant Town, WV.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)....they could focus on doing the "People's Work" instead?
no_hypocrisy
(53,290 posts)when men were no longer required to teach in suits and ties and women only dresses or skirts.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,619 posts)
Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)onenote
(45,703 posts)Jordan also gets criticized here for not wearing a jacket.
Seems like a bit of a double standard.
Jose Garcia
(3,314 posts)SouthernDem4ever
(6,619 posts)Isn't that what you wear most of the time anyway?
SomewhereInTheMiddle
(571 posts)... because of his policies, his history, and his connections - not because of his chosen attire. In fact, I voted for him despite his clothes choices on the campaign trail.
As a life-long democrat and one of his constituents - one of the people he is being paid to represent - I would rather he wear more formal attire while on the floor or in committee meetings. I would rather he represent me in at least business casual than in shorts.
Is what he wears more important than what he says or how he votes? Not at all.
But his personal presentation reflects on his constituents as well as himself. Like so many of us in our professional lives, he knew the dress code when he took the job.
While reasonable accommodations can be made for special needs, if his desired wardrobe is not medically required to help manage depression or other health needs, then I would like to see him dressed as I would if I were asked to attend a meeting at the Senate.
I am one of those he represents in the halls of power. I would rather he dress in a way that will not cause the others with whom he is negotiating to belittle him either openly or in their minds. It may put us at a disadvantage in those interactions. It also draws attention away from the work I voted him into office to do.
That is my personal opinion. I understand and accept that others will have different ones.
[Quickly crouches in a bunker and pulls on a hard hat.]
BlueIn_W_Pa
(842 posts)Appropriate dress shows respect for the office you hold.
mentalsolstice
(4,619 posts)However, he may not known its effects of having to dress like that most of the day, everyday. I have read up on him a bit and while he had to wear conventional clothing at times, it appears he could dress in a way that was comfortable to him most of the time. https://du4.democraticunderground.com/100218288461
Hopefully the senate will work something out, it shouldnt be that hard.
cayugafalls
(5,933 posts)All while ignoring the Bimbert and the Filth in their own party.
As an aside, (stop reading if you trigger easy)
I wore regular business attire my whole life even though I preferred shorts and t.
I did not do it because I wanted to 'fit it' or 'go un-noticed' or 'blend in'...
I did it because at a very early stage of my career I learned that if I removed any 'visible triggers' when doing business dealings I could control the conversations and guide the meetings in a much more effective and efficient way.
Whether Congress has a dress code, I could care less. I am not in congress.
Senator Fetterman can dress as he pleases, this is America.
Polybius
(20,942 posts)This time it's Manchin, and Durbin agrees with him. From the main article:
The senator in question from Pennsylvania is a personal friend, but I think we need to have standards when it comes to what were wearing on the floor of the Senate, and were in the process of discussing that right now as to what those standards will be, Durbin told The Briefing with Steve Scully on SiriusXMs POTUS channel.
I think the Senate needs to act on this, Durbin said.
yaesu
(8,622 posts)How about a kilt?
yardwork
(68,194 posts)And I'm a Boomer.
wendyb-NC
(4,489 posts)You can use your brains to bring up some legislation to help the American people, or reduce greenhouse gasses, or conserve pristine wilderness, or reduce childhood poverty. Think hard.
NoMoreRepugs
(11,656 posts)insurrection against my Democracy are in orange jumpsuits. Get a grip people and concentrate on what's important not the next shiny object that flashes before you.
Kid Berwyn
(22,071 posts)
No other club would want you or your yacht, either.
mahina
(20,085 posts)Him and his grotesque stinkpot
Crowman2009
(3,276 posts)Any other colonial fashions that I forgot to add? Please reply with any other long forgotten 1700's clothing traditions.
Bayard
(27,278 posts)I have no respect for Manchin.
However, I have to go with the Respect for the Office group. Professionalism. Being taken seriously, and representing Dems nationally, is more important than personal comfort. We can't afford to give any little thing to rethuglicans to exploit.
I'm betting Fetterman won't have much company in the very casual dress club.
Magoo48
(6,630 posts)DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)And it just figures that Manchin would be the one to make an issue of this....
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)Joinfortmill
(19,070 posts)Crowman2009
(3,276 posts)Luckily they aren't getting younger.
Joinfortmill
(19,070 posts)Sgent
(5,858 posts)is a reasonable requirement IMHO. Maybe allow senators who need assistance with walking a little more leeway, but as someone who has had to dress a wheelchair bound person khakis and a collared shirt are no more difficult than sweats to put on (assuming you don't tuck them in).
Redleg
(6,640 posts)tavernier
(13,983 posts)Theres no money in it for you regardless of what Fetterman wears.
Fresh Water Falling
(237 posts)America burns.
oasis
(52,995 posts)sellitman
(11,718 posts)Oops!
Totally unimportant IMHO.
So much wrong with the current state of affairs that this isn't even news.
summer_in_TX
(3,856 posts)Many stroke victims use clothing that is easy to take on and off. Sweatpants and so forth. With Fetterman's wife not there, he may have to wear things he can get on and off and manage by himself.
He is unusually big and I'm sure it's both time-consuming and expensive to get clothing made that fits him and follows the Senate's dress code. With his wife home with their kids, I can easily see how difficult he may have it with wearing a suit: buttoning shirts and cuffs, tying a tie, getting his pants up and fastened, putting on a belt, getting socks on and pulled up, shoes, jacket. My dad had trouble with those things and abandoned them in favor of sweats in his last years. Fetterman isn't rich and cannot afford custom-made clothes and a valet to help him dress, I'd guess.
It's an opportunity to educate Congress and the public about issues of accessibility and reasonable accommodations for certain disabilities. But I'd love to see this fine senator able to appear his best and take advantage of the regard people unconsciously have for a certain standard of dress.
If I had a business specializing in adaptive clothing, I'd see this as an opportunity to step up and help the Senator with clothes that he can get in and out of by himself but that look good on him and help keep his clothes from being a distraction or a barrier to working well with others on his issues and to successful re-election. They'd undoubtedly garner a lot of free media attention. I don't know if Fetterman could accept such clothing for free, if he'd need to at least pay company costs, or if friends and family could help make that happen for him.
SomewhereInTheMiddle
(571 posts)... if they are needed for physical or mental health issues or challenges.
I don't agree to changing the sartorial culture if it is only to satisfy someone's clothing preferences.
As for costs, I was able to buy a couple of suits and some slacks and jackets as a teacher or civil servant making far less than a senator makes. They were not Brooks Brothers, but they met the professional standard.
I don't know which is the case here - need or preference. It makes a difference.
Given that I trust Fetterman's integrity enough to have voted for him, I should give him the benefit of the doubt in this case.
summer_in_TX
(3,856 posts)I have no idea of the cost of custom-made suits. I understand he got one for his swearing in ceremony, so he has that one. Looked sharp in it too. But his wife was there for that event, so if he did need help with buttons and so forth, she was there.
But I don't know whether the stroke is an issue or not.
Redleg
(6,640 posts)1. Don't require men to wear ties.
2. Don't require suit jackets or sports coats.
3. I am fine with slacks and dress shirt and comfortable shoes.
4. Hoodies and shorts might be a bit far but I'm not going to fight that battle here.