Air Force suspends leaders of alleged Pentagon leaker Jack Teixeira's unit
Last edited Wed Apr 26, 2023, 09:42 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: CBS News
The Air Force has temporarily suspended two leaders of the unit where accused Pentagon document leaker Jack Teixeira worked, according to the Air Force.
The commander of the 102nd Intelligence Support Squadron and the detachment commander overseeing administrative support have both been temporarily suspended from their leadership positions and have temporarily lost access to classified systems and information.
Teixeira, the 21-year-old who allegedly posted hundreds of classified Pentagon documents online for months, worked as a systems administrator in the 102nd Intelligence Wing in the Massachusetts Air National Guard. The two commanders are suspended pending further investigation by the Air Force inspector general.
As more information becomes available, more members of Teixeira's unit could face suspension or removal. The Air Force reassigned the unit's intelligence mission to other units earlier this month and ordered the inspector general to probe the unit's policies and procedures related to the handling of national security information.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pentagon-leaker-jack-teixeira-intelligence-unit-leaders-suspended-air-force/

paleotn
(21,053 posts)Shit like that usually runs uphill in the military.
ffr
(23,286 posts)Then this kind of life threatening bullshit will stop. Until then, we can expect national secret security clearances to be the national joke that they appear to be.
republianmushroom
(21,697 posts)Rebl2
(17,109 posts)units they reassigned it to were thoroughly checked out before it transferred.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)Command sloppiness is not acceptable.
Kennah
(14,465 posts)Speaking as someone with 30+ years of IT experience (mostly doing app development), I have always believed that most places do not sufficiently safeguard info. We IT nerds have way more access to way more stuff than we should. I've pushed rocks up hills over the years on this issue, but I rarely succeed.
sybylla
(8,655 posts)My SO fights these same battles at work. It doesn't help that IT wants to build a little fiefdom over their servers, either.
plimsoll
(1,690 posts)But this appears to have been improper controls.
This person should not have had access to the information. He should not have been able to copy the data and remove it from the facility. It doesn't really matter what controls are in place if you give root access to everyone.
In one respect this is much like the classic stories of the Stasi and KGB recruiting clerical workers with the lure of a more exciting life. So this should have been a lesson learned by the intelligence services in the 1950s.
IronLionZion
(50,126 posts)I would hope every service would assess their access management policies after this.