State Supreme Court removes measure to split California into three states from November ballot
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by muriel_volestrangler (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: LA Times
In a brief order, the court said it acted because significant questions have been raised regarding the propositions validity and because we conclude that the potential harm in permitting the measure to remain on the ballot outweighs the potential harm in delaying the proposition to a future election.
The court, meeting in closed session, also agreed to rule eventually on the measures constitutionality, a ruling that is likely to go against the initiative.
They would not have removed it from the ballot unless it was their considered judgment that it is very likely not a valid measure that can go to the voters, said University of Illinois law school Dean Vikram Amar.
The environmental group contended in its challenge that the measure amounted to a proposed revision of the state Constitution, which can be placed on the ballot only if two-thirds of both houses of the Legislature approve.
Proposition 9 fundamentally conflicts with the Constitution and proposes instead to disregard and abolish Californias current governmental structure, including the Constitutions declared freedoms, the group said in written arguments to the court.
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-three-state-court-20180718-story.html
Boom! Eat shit Putin!


Dopers_Greed
(2,647 posts)This was the thing I was most worried about in November
Lochloosa
(16,598 posts)Snellius
(6,881 posts)The ballot initiative process in CA has often been either ground-breaking or completely weird. The idea was good, to pass laws without going through the governor or legislature as long as citizens got enough signatures to put them on the ballot. But it often created some far-fetched proposals. That sometimes, with heavy, interest-group financed media promotion, passed. I remember ages ago when CA had on the ballot a proposition to ban what they were calling then "pay TV, an initiative funded largely by movie theater owners to not allow current films to be shown on a demand basis on TV. Basically, people were voting to give up their freedom of choice. It passed. Of course, it was completely unconstitutional and the State Supreme Court promptly threw it out.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)Initech
(106,531 posts)
rocktivity
(44,935 posts)


rocktivity
Initech
(106,531 posts)Notice how they drew it so that Hollywood and LA were part of the new state - conveniently away from Nor Cal and So Cal. So yeah.
Dopers_Greed
(2,647 posts)rocktivity
(44,935 posts)
rocktivity
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)This just reminded me of that is all.
jmowreader
(52,703 posts)Divide California into seven states.
Divide the Bay Area into three states.
Divide the LA Basin into three states.
Put all Californias red areas into the seventh.
This gives us two Democratic senators to nullify anything the two new Russian senators do, and an additional ten Democratic senators. The GOP will never have a Senate majority again.
SunSeeker
(56,933 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(104,983 posts)of https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142113067 . Please continue discussion there. Thanks.