General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums1-Year-Old Boy Killed After Police Shot At His Car In Walmart Parking Lot

The death of a 1-year-old Mississippi boy who died after a police officer shot at a vehicle he was inside of during a shoplifting call is sparking questions among family members.
It didnt have to happen this way. It couldve been handled differently, LiCole Wiley, a relative to those involved in the alleged shoplifting incident told local news station WREG.
Officers from the Senatobia Police Department and deputies from the Tate County Sheriffs Office responded to a shoplifting report at a local Walmart on Sunday, where they encountered two adults and a child fleeing the store in a vehicle, according to a statement by the The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation.
One witness told the outlet in a separate report that the officers were already waiting in the parking lot as two women exited the store. The witness said one of the suspects was holding a box of diapers, while the other was holding a baby.
Snip
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/baby-shot-dead-mississippi-box-diapers_n_6a316636e4b07f7766eb0f8b
2naSalit
(104,547 posts)Were probably aware that there was a baby in the car.
Fuck those guys, I hope they get what they actually deserve.
LiberalArkie
(19,965 posts)PatSeg
(53,894 posts)why did they need to shoot their guns over the theft of DIAPERS?
Response to PatSeg (Reply #26)
Name removed Message auto-removed
AloeVera
(4,582 posts)Or you just always believe the police after a fatal shooting of a black boy?
On edit: Welcome to DU! Your very first post!
niyad
(135,100 posts)PatSeg
(53,894 posts)And he/she was answering my comment. Darn!
AloeVera
(4,582 posts)Parroting the police story. Said authoritatively, as if he/she were an eyewitness. The police never lie after shooting a Black child, you see.
niyad
(135,100 posts)Response to AloeVera (Reply #56)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NewHendoLib
(61,930 posts)niyad
(135,100 posts)sop
(19,738 posts)That's what cops are trained to claim every time they shoot up a moving vehicle.
QueerDuck
(2,061 posts)... that will either confirm or refute the claims. What a terrible tragedy. 😢😢
sakabatou
(46,508 posts)QueerDuck
(2,061 posts)"Cellphone video footage obtained by Fox 13 Memphis shows a vehicle driving away from officers, but does not appear to capture the moment of the shooting. A photo of the car shows bullet holes in the windshield."
"An eyewitness told WREG that 'I seen the officers take off running, not in the car, Im talking about on feet...Theyre running through the parking lot and I see the car take off, you know, so in my head, Im like, I know theyre not chasing the car, they dont think theyre going to catch the car. Then I hear gunshots, and Im like, I know theyre not shooting at a car thats leaving in public; this is Walmart.
"Another witness said that he heard two gunshots fired by officers who were already waiting in the Walmart parking lot as the two women left the store holding a box of diapers and the baby."
"Relatives of the slain toddler said his mother and aunt were not shoplifting and expressed wariness about local police, who have been embroiled in multiple brutality scandals involving Black victims in recent years."
'Senatobia Police Department get away with too much stuff,' Stokes, the great-grandmother, told WREG. 'I hear about it all the time, its in the news all the time.' "
https://www.commondreams.org/news/kohen-wiley
niyad
(135,100 posts)written those last two paragraphs without even knowing the story.
dweller
(28,865 posts)And the one that needed them is no longer in need
😣
so fukked up
✌🏻
Pinback
(13,695 posts)littlemissmartypants
(35,299 posts)CNYHarris
(154 posts)Asking for a friend.
Can I try to claim Canada or would that be bad?
electric_blue68
(27,779 posts)Going after shoplifters with guns!
Let's see the the dashcam, or parking lot cans to see if the cops were telling the truth.
Poor child, poor parent!
niyad
(135,100 posts)electric_blue68
(27,779 posts)Alleged shoplifters.
marble falls
(73,291 posts)... they had the plate information, they could have picked them up later that day.
pat_k
(14,435 posts)If I'm proven wrong, and it was somehow self-defence, I'll be shocked.
The tragedy is that they didn't just take the licence plate, let them go, and follow up later.
Or just fucking let them go.
Shop lifting does not justify the risks of a pursuit with guns drawn under ANY circumstances.
Wednesdays
(23,384 posts)Just ask Renee Good.
orangecrush
(31,722 posts)niyad
(135,100 posts)Response to pat_k (Reply #7)
niyad This message was self-deleted by its author.
Wiz Imp
(10,711 posts)The US Department of Justice Policy:
https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force
1. Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.
2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force.
pat_k
(14,435 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,711 posts)Even if she was trying to run the guy over (she wasn't) his actions completely violated DOJ and basic Law Enforcement policies.
pat_k
(14,435 posts)I would be very surprised if there are many departments that haven't.
a kennedy
(36,680 posts)Manatee
(42 posts)the body cam footage.
KS Toronado
(24,083 posts)
B.See
(9,033 posts)woman whose dog was killed by 911 responders was lucky they didn't shoot her, and now this. I've lost count of such instances.
"Feared for their lives." "Stood their ground." Convenient defences... Afforded to SOME.
Blue Full Moon
(3,755 posts)Shoplifting is a fine. Death is a cruel and unusual punishment. They usually get the tag off the parking lot cameras. Go to the house.
PatSeg
(53,894 posts)Things must have been slow and boring for them. Meanwhile, shoplifting should be low on priorities for them.
marble falls
(73,291 posts)OC375
(1,189 posts)I can absolutely fault executing a shoplifter. That's craven. We don't kill for stealing anymore in modern society.
I'll reserve judgement on shooting someone who might be trying to run anyone over, cops included, if that's actually the case here.
dweller
(28,865 posts)in the passenger seat
not driving
😑
https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100221310517
✌🏻
OC375
(1,189 posts)Torchlight
(7,176 posts)much more lasting and permanent consequence than others.
OC375
(1,189 posts)LiberalArkie
(19,965 posts)Used to be "the person assaulted me" (sometimes by sneezing in the LEO's direction)
Wiz Imp
(10,711 posts)that even if a driver is trying to driving toward a cop with their car, shooting them is NOT an acceptable response.
https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force
1. Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.
2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force.
OC375
(1,189 posts)I'll wait for more information, thanks.
Farmer-Rick
(12,834 posts)A foreign occupying army. Shoot first, ask questions later. We are all the enemy after all.
Murdered a baby for a box of diapers that Walmart won't miss..... geez.
niyad
(135,100 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 16, 2026, 09:07 PM - Edit history (2)
Did they steal the crown jewels?? A BOX OF DIAPERS?? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME???
Any bets on the alleged shoplifters?
maxsolomon
(39,333 posts)This isn't the 1st shooting at a Walmart; it's just the 1st killing of a child.
The cops were likely working with Store Security on a stakeout.
slightlv
(8,144 posts)They determined that shoplifting a box of diapers (if they, in fact, DID) was a crime worthy of murdering a 1 year old baby?!
We're deep into Les Miserables territory here. They weren't shoplifting a 65 inch TV, or other high end product. Baby diapers! That is right on par with the theft of a loaf of bread in the novel...
SMDH. This is NOT a safe country in which to live! We not only have to watch out for our "neighbors" with guns, we can't trust the "authorities" with guns, either!
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(15,351 posts)dave99
(405 posts)maxsolomon
(39,333 posts)He's African American.
AverageOldGuy
(4,320 posts)niyad
(135,100 posts)Response to maxsolomon (Reply #24)
Name removed Message auto-removed
PatSeg
(53,894 posts)Some shoplifters seem more inclined to be shot than others.
Response to dave99 (Reply #20)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Buddyzbuddy
(3,010 posts)Well, it was unlikely to have been baby formula that was shoplifted because that's now secured behind lock and key. We wouldn't want the owners to suffer a financial loss just to feed babies. What could possibly have been so valuable to risk the death of anybody, let alone a 1 year old? Accidental or not.
niyad
(135,100 posts)JoseBalow
(9,862 posts)
The Blue Flower
(6,644 posts)One of my favorites.
AverageOldGuy
(4,320 posts)And they are Black. The one -yr-old is guilty.
Upthevibe
(10,273 posts)SpankMe
(3,794 posts)WalMart itself should write a letter of protest to the cops and city council of this town:
"While WalMart appreciates the efforts of police in our comunities to enforce laws on shoplifting and prosecute the offenders, we feel that escalations up to the use of deadly force for these low level property crimes are inappropriate. It has a negative impact on the communities that we - the police and WalMart - serve. We don't wish to be seen as condoning the deaths of customers who have strayed from taking the high road at our expense. Mistakes in judgement should not result in violent death.
"We do understand that the use of deadly force by police is justified in cases where a perpetrator is armed and is presenting a clear and present danger to police or others. However, recent police encounters - such as the one in Tate County, MS, where a 1 year old infant was killed by police gunfire as the child's caretaker was fleeing a WalMart with the child and stolen merchandise in hand - fall far short of the discipline, restraint, and de-escalation that Americans normally associate with responsible police work. We don't want fleeing suspects to be killed in our name.
Sincerely, WalMart"
niyad
(135,100 posts)ever did send such a letter.
purr-rat beauty
(1,582 posts)....the Waltons want the diapers back, f#ck the community.
oasis
(54,218 posts)dave99
(405 posts)oasis
(54,218 posts)whiff of this , Im betting hell be on the case.
Blue Owl
(59,915 posts)niyad
(135,100 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,711 posts)Even if a driver is trying to drive toward a cop with their car, shooting them is NOT an acceptable response.
https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force
1. Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.
2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force.
purr-rat beauty
(1,582 posts)Why do we pay for many of their employees healthcare?
Can we shoot the Waltons?