Where is the United Nations at this particular point in time regarding

[no_hypocrisy]

Trump attacking Iran and not in defense of the United States? Humanitarian crisis. Etc.

[malaise]

1. Good question

Rec

[bucolic_frolic]

2. Yeah, that's a good question, and it's already a month late /nt

[EnergizedLib]

3. Kicked out of New York if they say anything?

[mr715]

4. The UN doesn't have much hard power against the USA

[gulliver]

5. They're probably working on a PowerPoint deck

And trying to reach consensus on who's turn it is to deliver the strongly worded rebuke.

[NoMoreRepugs]

6. My guess is they are discussing a world where the U.S. is their ENEMY.

[RockRaven]

7. Probably not eager to display their impotence and/or fecklessness.

[muriel_volestrangler]

8. About where they always are where a permanent SC member breaks international law?

ie they could hold an SC vote, and the USA would veto it (like Russia vetoes votes against it) or they could hold a general assembly vote, which is purely symbolic.

Cuba would be a more realistic area for the UN to push for a solution to a humanitarian crisis. The problem in Iran is bombs, and the UN can't stop those. Members could try and take oil to Cuba for humanitarian purposes, and dare Trump to stop them (after he let his mate Putin take a ship in).

[JI7]

9. What do you think the UN will do ? It's just made up of the countries

around the world.

[usonian]

10. U.N. position shown below.