Patriarchy, Purity, and Power: How James Dobson Helps Explain MAGA Evangelical Silence on the Epstein Files
https://buckscountybeacon.com/2026/04/patriarchy-purity-and-power-how-james-dobson-helps-explain-maga-evangelical-silence-on-the-epstein-files/
You cant question authority in high-control environments and under patriarchy, men are the ones with authority. When men misstep, they can be absolved without any show of remorse or promise of change," said Sara Moslener, a lecturer at Central Michigan University and an expert on purity culture.
by Jessica Jernigan
| April 1, 2026
Among the millions of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein released by the Justice Department on January 30, there are many boldface namessome familiar from previous disclosures, some new. While mainstream media have focused on figures like Steve Bannon and Sarah Ferguson, progressive Christian and exvangelical bloggers and podcasters have been talking about James Dobson. His name appears just once in the files, and there is no evidence he had a relationship with Epstein, let alone any suggestion he was implicated in Epsteins crimes. Nevertheless, understanding why Dobson turns up in a text conversation Epstein had with an unnamed woman is a skeleton key for understanding evangelical responses to the Epstein filesand, perhaps more crucially, the conspicuous silence of people and organizations that claim to protect women and children.
If you dont know James Dobsons name, you may know Focus on the Family, the organization he launched in 1977 to promote what he called biblical marriage and childrearing. Though Dobson claimed the organization was apolitical, from the moment he began advising Ronald Reagan in the early 1980s Dobson was one of the most powerful forces in Republican politics. And, right up until his death in 2025, arguably the most powerful evangelical leader in the United States.
The evangelical silence on Epstein is easier to understand once you accept Mosleners premise: that the fundamental ideas of purity culture are no longer a fringe movement but part of the mainstream. A culture that has internalized the belief that powerful men deserve the benefit of the doubt, that women who are hurt by men should extend empathy rather than demand accountability, and that female sexuality exists to serve male interests does not need to contend with the Epstein files. It just needs to say nothing. And in that silence, the movement reveals what it was always really protectingand who.