Damn, this is savage

[SocialDemocrat61]

from the No Kings protest in Buffalo, NY.

[hlthe2b]

1. Maybe. But I would not be laughing so hard if she did not immensely deserve it...

[sheshe2]

2. Ouch.

....and Epstein lurking in the background.

[Walleye]

51. I saw that I was wondering if it was real

I’ve never looked that closely at pictures of Melania. But I know she and Donald used to double date with Epstein and Maxwell.

[ShazzieB]

55. I dont think it is.

Hard to tell for sure without a closer look than we can get from the picture of the sign, but it looks off to me. Like the head isn't at the correct angle, and the color of the face doesn't quite match the body.

[dutch777]

3. And Donnie is probably saying "Yeah, that's my girl!". Poor Barron, the MOST embarrassing parents.

[mercuryblues]

7. Fuck, he turned out just like them.

[littlemissmartypants]

24. Psychopaths give birth/life to Psychopaths.

That's why I have decided NOT to call DJ a sociopath. He was (in the immortal words of the beloved Lady Gaga) born this way.

Criminal behavior runs in the family. A quick internet search proves that hypothesis. I rest my case. ⚖️

[lostnfound]

58. So if it's genetic and predetermined, aren't they blameless?

And the society that doesn’t rescue such children from psychopathic parents would be more to blame than the children.

Saying that “Psychopaths give birth/life to Psychopaths” doesn’t help those unfortunate souls suffering under the thumb of such awful parenting.

[a kennedy]

4. OMGAWD!!!!!!!!

BRAVO!!!!

[flvegan]

5. Damn, this is fake.

That picture of Melania on that protest sign is fake. I like the idea, though.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/melania-trump-pole-dancing-epstein/?collection=472552

[a kennedy]

6. Damn, damn, damn.......

I wanted it to be true......

[flvegan]

9. I'm not saying that situation never occurred since

pole dancing* for a child trafficker seems right up her alley. I'm just stating that the picture in and of itself is fake.

We'd know better if she had if the assclowns running this current shitshow of a country would release unredacted all the Epstein files.

*Not that there's anything wrong with that (pole dancing, generally).

[DinahMoeHum]

11. The sentiment, though, is spot-on.

Last edited Sun Mar 29, 2026, 12:55 PM - Edit history (1)

Too many of us consider her to be a pole-dancer, or a prostitute. Dresses like one, decorates like one, etc.

[BattleRow]

15. No doubt she has graced many "poles",including disgraceful ones.

[Jack Valentino]

34. Has any other previous 'first lady' been portrayed as a 'pole dancer',

and would so many people have believed it if it had happened before ??



My favorite song for Melanoma

[Aristus]

30. Who cares if it's true or not? Rumor alone is sufficient proof of guilt.

The Republicans taught me that.

[a kennedy]

31. Right, and I should've known that.

Last edited Sat Mar 28, 2026, 10:00 PM - Edit history (1)

[Aristus]

32. I just hope some Republican lurkers are reading this right now.

[whathehell]

37. True or not, it's sexist garbage..

I'm always amazed at the "Misogyny Rocks When it targets Women We Don't Like" crowd.

[ShazzieB]

56. Agreed.

I really don't give a hoot about Ms. Be Beest's past, whether she was a sex worker, a kindergarten teacher, or a freaking nun. It makes ABSOLUTELY NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE and has no bearing on what a huge asshole, moron, sadist, psychopath, liar, malignant narcissist, rapist, greedy pig, criminal, and Worst President Ever her husband is. I don't like her at all, but this is gross.

[whathehell]

59. Correct..

This sort of thing on a progressive board is just an exercise in "selective", or perhaps "opportunistic" misogyny. Those engaging in it think targeting conservative and/or "unlikeable" females makes it 'ok'. They don't get that attacking on Condition of Birth, (gender, race, etc.) rather than CHARACTER, makes it no more 'ok' than attacking people like Clarence Thomas in terms of his race.

[young_at_heart]

45. I believe it IS true!!

Heck...it might as well be true. Definitely believable and such a MAJOR embarrassment to this country! CRINGE!!!!!!

[debsy]

12. To quote Mrs Trump, "I really don't care, do you?"

[Bayard]

16. Buh Bye....

[sheshe2]

17. Nice way to start your day LG.

[sheshe2]

19. I am a Democrat...

Of course I went to a rally.

[niyad]

39. awwww gee, did I miss our regular troll?

[sheshe2]

40. No worries 😉

She will be back. 😱

[niyad]

42. This is so true.

[LearnedHand]

29. Doesn't matter in this case

She all but was a pole dancer. Fuck her if she can’t take a joke, amiright?

[progressoid]

33. Yeah they could have used any of a number of her racy photos instead.

I won't post them because...

[Lonestarblue]

41. They should have used the real photo of her naked and cuddling another naked woman.

[Susan Calvin]

43. I thought the face was a lot prettier than hers.

The person in the photo actually looks human.

[radical noodle]

44. There are actually worse photos of her

That fake one was a gift.

[Ilsa]

46. There were plenty of scantilly-clad pics of her,

like the ones of her on the trump jet, that can be publically shown. Or R-rated pics of her with black rectangles in appropriate places.

[Alliepoo]

50. They were doing her a favor.

The real ones are much worse.

[hadEnuf]

8. Fake or not, it gets the point across.

We know what she is.

[Talitha]

23. Yes it does, and yes we certainly do.

[Jack Valentino]

35. yeah, the only issue is about the price

[hadEnuf]

38. What price? It's a joke.

Unless some idiot wanted to make a political commercial over it or something.

[paleotn]

10. Truth is often times savage.

Though the exact picture may not be real, we know who she is and what she's been about. That part fits.

[BattleRow]

13. Too good looking to be her.

[DoBW]

20. Einstein Visa

The "Einstein visa" is a colloquial term for the EB-1 visa, which is a U.S. employment-based permanent residency option for individuals with extraordinary abilities in various fields,

[Jack Valentino]

36. Guess Melanoma had 'extraordinary abilities' in at least one arena, in Trump's opinion

at the time that he married her----

although now they reputedly have separate bedrooms
because she can no longer stand the smell---
and sometimes doesn't even want to touch hands with him in public

[Initech]

21. Damn!!!!

[robbob]

22. The arguments here about whether this photo is fake (apparently it is),

Last edited Sat Mar 28, 2026, 09:02 PM - Edit history (1)

and whether woman have the right to express their sexuality in any way they choose without being shamed (of course they do) are, imho, kind of missing the point. To me it’s about the blatant hypocrisy of both the “religious right” and the main stream and especially RW media, to whit;

Melania’s career as a soft core porn model is well documented, as is her association with Jeffrey Epstein. This photo may be fake, but there are many other equally graphic images that could have been used, to make the point, which is:

We have NEVER seen a First Lady with this kind of background, and the media and the religious right basically glossed it over. You know, that same media that threw a fit over Michelle Obama’s bare shoulder sleeveless dress? It’s the hypocrisy that gets me. I think there was even a religious “leader” (aka charlatan) who was waxing poetic over her “tasteful artistic nudes”. And this goes for all the MAGA fundamentalist types: many don’t even believe these nude photo’s exist; they don’t want to know.

That being said, this persons choice to use a fake image, while still making the point about her well documented background, was probably not the right one.

[70sEraVet]

25. I went to a protest today without a sign -- it was a last-minute decision.

But while I was there, I was thinking about making a poster that had trump in a skimpy swimsuit with a headline "Pedo in a Speedo"! It, of course, wouldn't be a 'real' image. But I 'really' wish I had done it!

[Walleye]

52. Great caption!

[stopdiggin]

26. right on both scores

use of fake image probably a bad move .. (will point out however that this individual ginned up this image for a single instance of use on a protest sign - which is quantitatively different than shooting it out on the web w/endless repeats and 'shares' on social media.)

And yes - the hypocrisy is absolutely staggering. However - the acceptance or 'glossing' of the absolute wanton lack of anything like character, quality, qualification or ability - starts with the person they have no hesitation in enshrining in the Oval office.
(i.e. - the moral deficiencies of the First Lady - are so completely overshadowed by that of her husband ... Who is really the 'leading' character here in terms of utter lack and deficiency ... )

[sarisataka]

53. Those few arguing a woman should not be shamed fror her sexuality

Are not missing the point of RW hypocrisy, they are saying RW hypocrisy should not be met with even greater hypocrisy from the left/progressives.

We expect the right to be hypocritical, it is kind of their trademark. But if we are also willing to so easily abandon our values to do acts we would otherwise condemn as abhorrent, do we really hold those values?

[robbob]

60. Well, it's seems to me more about the point one is trying to make:

If you are looking at her nude photos and saying “oh! What a tramp, what a s**t, what a Jezebel”, while also being a progressive especially on woman’s rights then yeah, you’re being a hypocrite.

I couldn’t care less about Melania’s past career choices; when I first heard about her modelling portfolio and nude photo’s my main thought was gee, how is the media going to handle this? The religious right? The morality police of the GOP, who head to the fainting couch over the slightest sign of “immoral” behaviour from the left, and not surprisingly they all just glossed over it and ignored it.

So while the poster in question displayed at the no kings rally certainly had that salacious aspect to it (how could it not?), it also was pointing out what a break from standards of behaviour from past First Ladies Melania truly represents, and her lying thieving adulterous con man husband doubly so.

As I said before, it’s the sheer hypocrisy that floors me.

[orleans]

27. is that aunt bea third down on the right? LOL

but anyway

[usonian]

28. If you don't like fake pictures, do you want real ones?

Contact 3KB2QNGG8

I am in no way associated with 3KB2QNGG8.

[Figarosmom]

47. Yeah, well.

Shows how cheap trumps tastes are. This is why the Oval Office looks like an interior designer's showroom.

[NJCher]

48. speaking as a former ad copywriter and designer

If this is a fake photograph, it was chosen because it makes the point in an "instant".

People give you about 3/10th of a second and then they are on to the next thing.

It's the same thing as the blazing yellow type on youtube videos. The phony "shock" facial expressions.

Personally, I loathe them but having done this for a living, I know what works and what doesn't. Yellow type is hard to beat.

Ask yourself if that pole dancing photo was changed to another, would the point have been made so instantly?

In making your judgment, you can visit this Daily Mirror link to see the available stock of nude Melanias.

My guesstimate as a former ad layout person is that there is nothing as immediately identifiable as the pole dancer. I agree that it's not the best thing to do, but the person making the sign went with the viewer getting the point in that 3/10th of a second over the ethics of using a fake photo.

The fact that Epstein is in the background further supports that the sign maker wanted to drive the point home.

[Alliepoo]

49. Savage

And accurate.

[Blue Owl]

54. Which one represents the Christian Nationalists?

The answer may should surprise you

[TommieMommy]

61. Good one 👍👍👍