General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (ariadne0614) on Sun Feb 15, 2026, 03:10 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
AZJonnie
(3,313 posts)eShirl
(20,155 posts)if so, that's disappointing
eShirl
(20,155 posts)xocetaceans
(4,382 posts)If you look at this following YouTube video from that same channel, they have a crude animation of George Will present but haven't figured out how to use his approximate voice yet:
Neither the mimicry of the animation nor of the voice in that video is well executed. It seems clear that they have just slapped a head or face on a body and anointed it "George Will".
AZJonnie
(3,313 posts)If content is has the flag "altered or synthetic content" it basically means you cannot rely on it like you otherwise might.
Sometimes such content is totally accurate, factually (for example though the words are not actually a recording of George Will, there might be written copy of him saying those exact words, that someone is using AI to "bring to life" ). Other times much, if not all, was never said by the person they're representing in such videos.
Basically it's good to be skeptical and independently verify everything in a "known AI generated" video.
rurallib
(64,633 posts)usaf-vet
(7,778 posts)biocube
(191 posts)Will didn't speak out against Bush, but against Trump.
Seems to be a pattern with these guys to suddenly find some principles at the tail end of their lives.
Response to ariadne0614 (Original post)
eShirl This message was self-deleted by its author.
2naSalit
(101,329 posts)This is AI fabricated.
Bev54
(13,355 posts)broiles
(1,447 posts)I am amazed that it's by George Will. Bravo!
broiles
(1,447 posts)about it being fake. But the message that it sends is really good no matter who makes it.
calimary
(89,399 posts)No matter who made it.
malaise
(294,486 posts)Rec. Rec. Rec
Pluvious
(5,328 posts)malaise
(294,486 posts)Because it said altered content but it does need to be said
PJMcK
(24,925 posts)Its too youthful sounding. Will is 84 years old. Even the man in the videos looks too young.
YouTube has been inundated with AI slop crediting the content to people living AND dead without their actual participation or permission. Ive seen it in many different genres from entertainment to science and politics.
Ive taken to checking the posting source before clicking on the videos.
😀
niyad
(130,828 posts)rzemanfl
(31,272 posts)Cirsium
(3,705 posts)From the Youtube page for this video-
How this was made:
Altered or synthetic content
Sound or visuals were significantly edited or digitally generated.
Uncle Joe
(64,631 posts)Thanks for the thread ariadne.
xocetaceans
(4,382 posts)If you have any doubt that it is a slop video, please just examine the YouTube channel from which it comes. It is apparent.
The channel doesn't even get George Will's voice approximately right in the first video.
31st Street Bridge
(138 posts)Cirsium
(3,705 posts)It is spelled out right on the page.
How this was made:
Altered or synthetic content
Sound or visuals were significantly edited or digitally generated.
Explained further here:
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/15447836?hl=en
Altered or synthetic content: This indicates that a video contains content that has been meaningfully altered or synthetically generated. There are several ways that this information ends up in the How this content was made section of the expanded description of a video.
You should expect to see this disclosure when:
The creator manually discloses the use of altered or synthetic content in the YouTube Studio workflow. When content is undisclosed, in some cases, YouTube may take action to reduce the risk of harm to viewers by proactively applying a label that creators will not have the option to remove. Learn more about our "altered or synthetic content" disclosures.
The creator uses YouTubes generative AI tools (e.g., DreamScreen).
The content contains valid Content Credentials data indicating the entire video is made with AI. Learn more about Content Credentials (C2PA).
dickthegrouch
(4,417 posts)flashman13
(2,231 posts)Well said George.
31st Street Bridge
(138 posts)Real or not, the message here is excellent.
dickthegrouch
(4,417 posts)It's a very powerful message, well worth listening all the way through.
The huge difference between previous responses to the Fascist takeovers, however, was that the images of the oppression were being distributed by news organizations that had integrity.
There are far too few public figures and news organizations actually showing the people what is happening. The major news organizations have been as thoroughly corrupted as the government and its agencies. Only a relatively tiny number of people know how badly.
The ICE situation in Minneapolis appears to be too big and compelling for the new orgs to suppress completely, but they are still spinning it, and trumpeting (pun intended) the noise that keeps coming from the Whitehouse to distract us.
False numbers, events and "truths" that never occurred; confusion over the policies and implementations; the incompetent and dangerous Cabal that dares to call itself a Cabinet, and is focussed more on undeserved adulation than administration, all are being covered up every day by the ultimately complicit news organizations afraid of losing access.
They have the access, but they are not reporting on the fundamental problems they are seeing due to that access. They are failing to insist on answers to the troubling, nay catastrophic, things they are witnessing.
That is the biggest challenge we have to overcome.
Cirsium
(3,705 posts)The video only gets attention because people think it is George Will. It isn't.
William Seger
(12,312 posts)... and I'm SURE you wouldn't approve of how right-wing channels use AI slop, probably with the same rationalization that you're using.
bif
(26,812 posts)If it is indeed, AI generated?
orangecrush
(29,515 posts)MineralMan
(150,939 posts)That means that YouTube has recognized that what you're looking at is AI Slop. Such videos are merely clickbait and don't belong here on DU.
Truly.
William Seger
(12,312 posts)Several weeks ago, I commented on one of their videos that deceiving people to make clickbait money is called fraud -- something I do every time I see AI slop -- but of course, they don't care about that as long as the money keeps coming in.
Pinback
(13,560 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(26,744 posts)SoFlaBro
(3,757 posts)chowder66
(12,038 posts)sop
(18,035 posts)rzemanfl
(31,272 posts)and it wasn't flagged as AI at that time. I'm sure it will be deleted when the poster gets back from church or wherever.
ariadne0614
(2,158 posts)First, I want to express appreciation for those of you who bothered to listen to the message being conveyed, and had the discernment to see past the messenger. The message may be AI-generated, but it wasnt slop. In my defense, even if I eliminate GW from the equation, I would still be deeply moved and impressed with the truth conveyed.
Yes, I probably shouldnt have been so quick to credit George Will without further research. For that, I will shortly delete the OP. As surprised as I was to hear such evolved content from GW, in the moment it seemed only fair to give credit where credit is due. Call me a bleeding heart liberal, but I believe most human beings have the capacity to evolve. So sue me.
Now that I know credit was NOT due, I will remove the post presently.
Response to ariadne0614 (Original post)
Warpy This message was self-deleted by its author.