Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Conservative Movement Was Ready For Antonin Scalia's Death - Balls and Strikes
Balls and Strikes Substack
https://ballsandstrikes.substack.com/p/the-conservative-movement-was-ready
In retrospect, the wildest thing about Justice Antonin Scalias death ten years ago today is that, for about 45 minutes, it really seemed like the good guys were going to win. Over the preceding 47 years, Democratic presidents had appointed exactly four justices to the Supreme Court, compared to 12 for Republican presidents. As a result, conservatives had comfortably controlled the Court throughout that period. Only the ideological defections of Justice John Paul Stevens and David SouterRepublican appointees who turned out to be staunch liberals, to the everlasting fury of Federalist Society types everywherekept the Court from morphing from a reliably conservative institution into a reactionary juggernaut.
Scalias sudden departure, both from the bench and from this mortal coil, was poised to change everything. With President Barack Obama set to replace Scalia with a fiftysomething liberal lawyer to be named later, the Court would have a solid liberal majority for the first time since the Warren Court era ended almost five decades earlier.
I was still working as a law firm associate then, so I dont have a good journalism war story to share from that day. But I could do basic math, and the penciled-in results looked promising: Roe v. Wade was safe. So was affirmative action. The Voting Rights Act, which Chief Justice John Roberts had gutted in Shelby County v. Holder, seemed on the verge of making a dramatic comeback. The conservative push to rewrite the Second Amendment to comport with the gun lobbys financial interests was over. Citizens United, which the Republican justices had used to open up corporate spending in elections in 2010, was surely on borrowed time.
Before most people even saw the New York Times push alert announcing Scalias death, though, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made his move, announcing that the Senate would not consider any potential replacement until after the 2016 election, which was set to take place in nine months. At the time, most Democratic politicians were still cobbling together statements extending their condolences to Scalias family. McConnell, meanwhile, managed to unite his entire caucus around a rule hed invented out of thin air: that the Senate need not fulfill its constitutionally prescribed duty to provide advice and consent on a Supreme Court nomination if Republicans dont like the president who made it.
Scalias sudden departure, both from the bench and from this mortal coil, was poised to change everything. With President Barack Obama set to replace Scalia with a fiftysomething liberal lawyer to be named later, the Court would have a solid liberal majority for the first time since the Warren Court era ended almost five decades earlier.
I was still working as a law firm associate then, so I dont have a good journalism war story to share from that day. But I could do basic math, and the penciled-in results looked promising: Roe v. Wade was safe. So was affirmative action. The Voting Rights Act, which Chief Justice John Roberts had gutted in Shelby County v. Holder, seemed on the verge of making a dramatic comeback. The conservative push to rewrite the Second Amendment to comport with the gun lobbys financial interests was over. Citizens United, which the Republican justices had used to open up corporate spending in elections in 2010, was surely on borrowed time.
Before most people even saw the New York Times push alert announcing Scalias death, though, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made his move, announcing that the Senate would not consider any potential replacement until after the 2016 election, which was set to take place in nine months. At the time, most Democratic politicians were still cobbling together statements extending their condolences to Scalias family. McConnell, meanwhile, managed to unite his entire caucus around a rule hed invented out of thin air: that the Senate need not fulfill its constitutionally prescribed duty to provide advice and consent on a Supreme Court nomination if Republicans dont like the president who made it.
The conservative legal movement spent decades preparing to capture the Court. Scalia's death gave them the chance they needed
— Balls & Strikes (@ballsandstrikes.org) 2026-02-14T21:22:00.791Z
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Conservative Movement Was Ready For Antonin Scalia's Death - Balls and Strikes (Original Post)
In It to Win It
23 hrs ago
OP
eppur_se_muova
(41,434 posts)1. Obvious CT: Conservatives were responsible for Scalia's death.
I know, the timing's not quite right, but it takes more than that to stop a CT.
