General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNigrum Cattus
(1,257 posts)Microsoft and most of all the big tech co's are backing
this complete failure. We will see major problems in
every system that uses A.I.
durablend
(9,046 posts)2naSalit
(101,181 posts)2naSalit
(101,181 posts)Coventina
(29,483 posts)Maybe by eliminating us, but I'd be ok with that....
Goonch
(4,427 posts)"what should people do when ai becomes a danger to them and how will they know the danger exists" ?
Easterncedar
(5,840 posts)Scared me decades ago. It foretold this moment.
snot
(11,598 posts)Also terrifying: I've tested AI's a number of times on subjects of greater and lesser obscurity, and in every case, the answers have contined crucial factual errors that might easily have been caught by any decent human researcher.
So not only will AI's soon control the world, but they're incompetent.
TheProle
(3,946 posts)You should paste in some of these and indicate the LLM models and dates when you ran the queries.
snot
(11,598 posts)but for the sake of my privacy, would rather not share them here. But fwiw, in the most recent test, the AI knew who I am but thought I was dead; in another within the last year, the AI stated that Assange was extradited to the U.S. (he wasn't); and in another, the AI offered a long, bull-sh*t discussion of renowned literary theorist Cleanth Brooks' analysis of paradox in Macbeth, and only after extensive further probing from me, finally admitted that it had in fact never "read" anything written by Brooks.
I don't mind so much that AI's get things wrong; what freaks me out is that they pronounce their erroneous conclusions with such certainty. You have to either fact-check every single detail or not rely on their answer at all.
That said, I realize they may be better in some areas.
slightlv
(7,598 posts)yourself to be safe... but it's the fact that business, medical, and government policy will be built on what they state as true... and we will, no doubt, have no recourse for arguing. THAT'S just plain scary. Anyone remember the old 70's book "Future Shock?"
F-18_AMO
(11 posts)in AI at work. No thanks. We dont need it. Supervisor said she used it to tweak her sourdough recipe. YHGTBFKM. I know that critical thinking is a thing of the past for some, but dayuuum.
Cheezoholic
(3,584 posts)Response to snot (Reply #8)
D_Master81 This message was self-deleted by its author.
PatSeg
(52,655 posts)Plus it is all happening so fast, with little or no time to adjust or regulate it.

