OK, here is a revised reply

[Cirsium]

Here is a revised reply, taking into account your latest remarks.

Your logic: if an insane paranoid person thinks the NYT is against him, then rational fellow DUers who point out that the NYT does a poor job of holding that insane person accountable are therefore wrong because a few DUers may be over the top with their animus towards the NYT.

That is even a bigger stretch on your part than I initially imagined, apparently just to get in a dig against Democrats with whom you disagree.