General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTurns out Thune really, REALLY wants that $500,000, calling it a "Senate-Specific Solution." SOLUTION, not "GRIFT."
The overwhelming House vote to repeal a provision allowing senators to sue if the Justice Department obtained their phone records without notice may ultimately fall flat as major obstacles in the Senate stand in the way of the change.
The House voted late Wednesday to scrap the Arctic Frost provision, which snuck its way into the final deal to end the shutdown last week and angered scores of lower chamber lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. The provision allows senators but not House members to sue the Justice Department and be awarded up to $500,000 damages for each instance of data collection. It is retroactive to 2022, so senators can sue over former special counsel Jack Smiths probe into efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Plenty of senators agree with their House counterparts, but Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has passionately defended the measure and shown little appetite to hold a vote on undoing it.
That was a Senate-specific solution. The statute that was violated applied only to the Senate, which is why we addressed it the way that we did, he told reporters at his weekly press conference. We strengthened that provision when it comes to allowing a federal government agency the Justice Department, in this case to collect information, private information, on individual senators. We think that is a violation of powers under the Constitution.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/house-push-overturn-500-000-110000620.html
Deuxcents
(24,928 posts)Miles Archer
(21,054 posts)THEN, you'll see the idea vanish faster than poop through a goose.
Irish_Dem
(78,158 posts)The best crooks make the law, they don't break it.
Midnight Writer
(25,021 posts)They are victimized by law enforcement more than any of these Senators were when under investigation.
malaise
(291,437 posts)That is all
Silent Type
(12,120 posts)They'd be suing the DOj, which will likely just roll over without mounting a defense.
Hell, the way the DOJ is currently they probably don't have a lawyer good enough to win if they did.
Silent Type
(12,120 posts)proper approval, etc., it should be investigated, whether GOPer or Democrat.
If some of those Senators were investigated under reasonable suspicion (which shouldnt be hard to prove), doubt theyll want to bring it out in open for voters to see.
spanone
(140,748 posts)FHRRK
(1,334 posts)Strange how those people think.