Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Aviation Pro

(14,981 posts)
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 12:58 PM Oct 24

Question, do the health care subsidies go directly to insurance companies?

I think they do, but I don’t know. And of course, Americans on the ACA will have to shoulder that responsibility should the child rapist enablers fail to come to the table.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question, do the health care subsidies go directly to insurance companies? (Original Post) Aviation Pro Oct 24 OP
My current ACA plan is about $1200 /month. Intractable Oct 24 #1
I had to use an ACA plan between the age of 61 and 65 GoodRaisin Oct 24 #3
Yes, it's basically the same "free-market solution" as RomneyCare was before it AZJonnie Oct 24 #2
It's really simple, probably 90% of ACA recipients wony JCMach1 Oct 24 #4

Intractable

(1,353 posts)
1. My current ACA plan is about $1200 /month.
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 01:06 PM
Oct 24

About $1000 of it is paid by the gov't.

The rest by me, and there are plenty of copays, deductibles, and things not covered.

The ACA mainlines money to the insurance companies.

Health insurance is not the same as healthcare.

GoodRaisin

(10,611 posts)
3. I had to use an ACA plan between the age of 61 and 65
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 02:37 PM
Oct 24

At one point I recall my plan being 1400/mo. I paid $17 a month, the government picked up the rest. There will be a shock wave once people see the new costs.

AZJonnie

(2,028 posts)
2. Yes, it's basically the same "free-market solution" as RomneyCare was before it
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 01:46 PM
Oct 24

The main tenets of it came directly from right-wing think tanks ... offhand I want to say most of came from an outfit called "Choice Point", maybe? Going from memory on that one but I know it was a right-wing think tank that came up with the basic tenets of how a "universal health insurance system" could operate and still pass muster with "free-market conservative values"

It was done this way because the GQP had a big hand in the drafting of the legislation, they basically insisted this was the only sort of system they'd buy into and give their imprimatur to (which Obama felt was important if it was going to succeed). They would NOT however go along with any sort of "public option" which is why that idea died on the vine during the drafting of the new system.

They GQP absolutely had their say on the whole thing, then in the end when it came time to vote turned around and fucked Obama and congressional Dems by voting against it en masse and calling it a "government takeover of healthcare" and claimed publicly it was all created without their input. Which as I say is fucking bullshit. The insurance companies also were totally down for it because as you note, it's a windfall for them.

This is also why the GQP is constantly failing to come up with a "better plan" cause it was largely THEIR FUCKING PLAN in the first place, and they've been gaslighting about it for 15 fucking years like the fucking assholes they are.

JCMach1

(29,034 posts)
4. It's really simple, probably 90% of ACA recipients wony
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 04:15 PM
Oct 24

Be able. To afford the insurance without the subsidies.

It would essentially kill the ACA and a a lot of people who can no longer afford care.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question, do the health c...