Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFor whatever reason, this Donald Rumsfeld classic popped up in my FB feed today.......
..... thinking about our current situation, it almost makes you long for the days when our biggest battle was against warmongering Neocons.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For whatever reason, this Donald Rumsfeld classic popped up in my FB feed today....... (Original Post)
marmar
Thursday
OP
Turbineguy
(39,538 posts)1. Rumsfeld v Hegseth.
COL Mustard
(7,731 posts)2. I'd take Rumsfeld in a heartbeat.
He was serious, had gravitas and knew how the Pentagon worked. I might have had problems with some of his decisions, but the man was a serious professional. Hegseth is a C-list actor who plays to an audience of one.
Wifes husband
(631 posts)3. He was a lying asshole
Prairie Gates
(6,596 posts)4. Zizek did a nice bit on this
Rumsfeld mentions
Known knowns
Known unknowns
Unknown unknowns
The only combination he doesn't mention is
Unknown knowns
This is, of course, the Lacanian Real, conveniently enough for Zizek - hilariously both unstated by Rumsfeld and paradoxical within Rumsfeld's system of knowledge (how can there be an unknown known - that which we don't / can't know that we know?).
I usually don't like Zizek's stuff, but I found that one quite clever, I have to say.