Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(290,451 posts)
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 08:22 AM Tuesday

The umpire who picked a side: John Roberts and the death of rule of law in America

From August
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/aug/21/justice-john-roberts-supreme-court

On 4 March, Donald Trump delivered his epic 100-minute speech to Congress, the longest such presidential address in US history. Having finished speaking, in time-honored fashion, he walked down the line of supreme court justices, gladhanding each in turn before coming to a stop before the chief justice, John Roberts.

“Thank you again, thank you again,” Trump said, taking Roberts’s hand into both his own and shaking it vigorously. Then, as he began to step away, the president tapped Roberts on the arm in a gesture of buddy-buddy intimacy, and said: “Won’t forget.”

Supreme court watchers have wondered why Trump thanked the chief justice so effusively. Was it because the Roberts court had, exactly a year earlier, allowed Trump to stay on the electoral ballot even though he had inspired a violent mob attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021?

Could it have been that Roberts had written the ruling that immunised Trump from criminal prosecution for that January 6 insurrection and for any other criminal misdeed he might commit while in the White House?

Or was it, as Trump later claimed, more innocent than that: a simple thank you to Roberts for having administered the oath of office at Trump’s second inauguration?

Whatever the truth, time has moved on since that friendly encounter five months ago. Were the president to bump into the chief justice today, one might expect an even more extravagant display of gratitude.

————-
We won’t forget either




10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The umpire who picked a side: John Roberts and the death of rule of law in America (Original Post) malaise Tuesday OP
K&R spanone Tuesday #1
I suspect that this will be the year that Roberts realizes how Volaris Tuesday #2
I hope that Roberts realizes that he will go down in history milestogo Tuesday #4
The irony is that he so very badly wants to NOT be Roger Taney 2.0.. Volaris Tuesday #5
Roberts and the other five "conservative" phony justices care nothing about the law Mysterian Tuesday #7
Cankles does nothing that is not reciprocal. The effusive thanks were for his immunity. Scrivener7 Tuesday #3
Roberts goal in life mountain grammy Tuesday #6
I suggest reading the article in it's entirety. JohnnyRingo Tuesday #8
It is a must read. dalton99a Tuesday #9
Agree malaise Tuesday #10

Volaris

(11,187 posts)
2. I suspect that this will be the year that Roberts realizes how
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 08:44 AM
Tuesday

tough it will be to call balls and strikes when one of the teams is trying to set the stadium on fire.

milestogo

(22,067 posts)
4. I hope that Roberts realizes that he will go down in history
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 08:49 AM
Tuesday

as the total fuckup who handed the country over to an immoral lunatic who is bent on destroying it all.

Volaris

(11,187 posts)
5. The irony is that he so very badly wants to NOT be Roger Taney 2.0..
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 08:59 AM
Tuesday

That he's gonna sidestep his way right into it, and now, there aren't enough liberals on the court to help force him back to the centerline.

Mysterian

(6,043 posts)
7. Roberts and the other five "conservative" phony justices care nothing about the law
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 11:25 AM
Tuesday

They care only for their wealth, power and furthering the end of democracy in the U.S.A.

mountain grammy

(28,351 posts)
6. Roberts goal in life
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 11:24 AM
Tuesday

Was dismantling the Voting Rights Act because he’s the fucking savior of white supremacy and that’s the legacy he wants.

JohnnyRingo

(20,239 posts)
8. I suggest reading the article in it's entirety.
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 11:39 AM
Tuesday

It's refreshing to hear the view from a foreign publication that delivers without interest in political division.
I found it eye opening and edifying.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The umpire who picked a s...