Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellow dahlia

(3,670 posts)
Fri Oct 17, 2025, 08:50 PM Oct 17

"172% of Voters Cast Ballots in Palm Beach Precinct 1716? Now That's Some Fuzzy Math."

From the THIS WILL HOLD Substack, October 17, 2025

Here is a tease of the numbers. The full article is linked below.

Florida’s Over-Turnout Precincts

Upon further investigation, (so far) six precincts were identified as having exceeded 100% turnout, raising additional concerns about registration integrity and reconciliation errors:

Palm Beach Precinct 1716: 222 registered, 382 votes, 172% turnout.

Palm Beach Precinct 5733: 6 registered, 8 votes, 133% turnout.

Palm Beach Precinct 2512: 4 registered, 5 votes, 125% turnout.

Miami-Dade Precinct 592: 2 registered voters, 4 total votes, 250% turnout.

Miami-Dade Precinct 458: 300 registered, 369 votes, 124% turnout.

Miami-Dade Precinct 288: 43 registered, 45 votes, 107% turnout.



https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/172-of-voters-cast-ballots-in-palm?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=18f629&triedRedirect=true
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"172% of Voters Cast Ballots in Palm Beach Precinct 1716? Now That's Some Fuzzy Math." (Original Post) yellow dahlia Oct 17 OP
Hope we don't run on CT crud like this. Silent Type Oct 17 #1
Of course, you have to take the blogger's word for it Fiendish Thingy Oct 17 #2
Surely the lack of links to the source data is a mere accident EdmondDantes_ Oct 17 #5
What if we're wrong? Chemical Bill Oct 17 #3
Keep counting. -- Gangs of New York Norrrm Oct 17 #4
OP Numbers Incorrect per Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections - No Apparent Issue Here cmmngrnd Oct 17 #6

Fiendish Thingy

(21,145 posts)
2. Of course, you have to take the blogger's word for it
Fri Oct 17, 2025, 09:12 PM
Oct 17

Because there is no evidence those numbers are true.

EdmondDantes_

(1,044 posts)
5. Surely the lack of links to the source data is a mere accident
Fri Oct 17, 2025, 10:40 PM
Oct 17

One they repeat again and again so often it might be mistaken for being intentional.

Chemical Bill

(2,963 posts)
3. What if we're wrong?
Fri Oct 17, 2025, 09:39 PM
Oct 17

If we're wrong, I guess some people will be embarrassed to be associated with us. I guess some people will tell us we are stupid. I guess there will be a huge landslide next year, and we will take the House and the Senate, and put a stop to the fascist agenda.

But what if we're right?

The dictatorship will not end in our lifetime.
If you ask me, the election of TSF, twice, proved that the cheating is too entrenched to pretend that the 2026 election will save us. I apologize if anyone is embarrassed.

https://open.substack.com/pub/electiontruthalliance/p/election-truth-alliance-preliminary?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=18f629

cmmngrnd

(22 posts)
6. OP Numbers Incorrect per Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections - No Apparent Issue Here
Fri Oct 17, 2025, 11:42 PM
Oct 17

Checked the Palm Beach numbers. I'll give links so you can check me. Links given for precinct 1716, but it's the same link for all of them. Looks like the only precinct that has more votes than voters is 2512 (5 votes, 4 voters) and it seems likely that one vote is simply a change in voter registration in the 12 months since the election. The other Palm Bay precincts in the OP are not anomalous.

I didn't check the Miami-Dade numbers. Since the Palm Beach numbers didn't match the OP, it doesn't seem like the Miami-Dade ones will either.

The cited article doesn't say how they got their numbers, so no way to check what they were doing.

A last note - using percentages (175%) when such small number are involved (5 vote, 8 votes) is a standard way to make things look bad when maybe things aren't so bad. Percentages and small sample sizes don't mix.

Precinct 1716:
Total votes: 382 (matches OP)
Registered voters: 412 (OP claims 222) PDF File, dated 9 Sept 2025
Registered voters: 416 (OP claims 222) Precinct calculator (you may have to select the precinct again)

Precinct 5733:
Total votes: 8 (matches OP)
Registered Voters: 9 (OP claims 6) per PDF file dated 9 Sept 2025
Registered voters: 9 (OP claims 6) per Precinct Calculator

Precinct 2512:
Total votes: 5 (matches OP)
Registered Voters: 4 (matches OP) per PDF file dated 9 Sept 2025
Registered voters: 4 (matches OP) per Precinct Calculator

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"172% of Voters Cast Ball...