General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThat didn't last long
https://x.com/i/grok/share/GdVPCIRj5MFaD7Z67wBdYZQ0WThe Financial Times post reports Israeli strikes in Gaza killing several Palestinians, occurring just one day after a U.S.-brokered ceasefire began on October 13, 2025, following a two-year war that killed nearly 68,000 Palestinians and 2,000 Israelis, highlighting the fragility of the truce.
Israeli military claims the strikes targeted individuals who crossed a designated "yellow line" boundary, a detail supported by Al Jazeera's report of the army opening fire on a group approaching soldiers, suggesting a possible escalation despite the ceasefire's intent to enable hostage-prisoner exchanges.
Historical context from Noam Chomsky's 2014 analysis and France's 2024 accusation of 52 ceasefire violations by Israel indicate a pattern of repeated breaches, raising questions about the effectiveness of current diplomatic efforts, though no peer-reviewed studies directly address the 2025 ceasefire's specifics yet.

marble falls
(68,902 posts)oasis
(53,056 posts)
usonian
(21,540 posts)Beartracks
(14,161 posts)Kinda makes you think it was all for show, a theatrical production to try and finagle some Nobel cred, or to distract from the Epstein files.
============
Fiendish Thingy
(21,042 posts)Dont you have some original source reporting?
pbmus
(13,116 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(21,042 posts)See other response that includes BBC YouTube video.
W_HAMILTON
(9,686 posts)Welcome to the party!
Is this reporting sufficient?
Fiendish Thingy
(21,042 posts)Some are accurate, some arent- they seem to scrape all available data, and report out what is most common/frequently seen on various sites.
That means a meme or clickbait or other false reporting could be accepted by AI as factual, just because it has spread profusely on the internet.
Of course BBC is reputable and reliable, and acceptable as original source reporting.
W_HAMILTON
(9,686 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(21,042 posts)And not expect every individual reader to fact check their post.
W_HAMILTON
(9,686 posts)...because we are reality-based -- not propaganda-based like MAGA -- and don't need to make up lies to further our points because there are actual verifiable stories (like this one) that support our positions.
Fiendish Thingy
(21,042 posts)If the OP had read original source reporting, then they should have posted that link, not the Grok summary
.
Seriously?
There have been countless incidents of falsehoods being posted at DU, many making the top of the Greatest Page despite being proven to be false. It happens almost daily.
People dont necessarily make up lies, but they post stories that say things they believe to be true, or want to be true, which then get recced without further questioning or examination.
A significant portion of the clickbait videos that get posted fall into this category.
W_HAMILTON
(9,686 posts)Between the much more fact-based nature of DU and the apparent contrarian slant there is among those on the left who would love nothing more than to prove someone wrong, I have much more faith in the ultimate credibility of DU than I do most every other source on the internet.
Kaleva
(40,016 posts)Its common to see tweets and vids that are at best misleading and at worst, outright false. However, the DU community is very good at fact checking OPs.
Johnny2X2X
(23,511 posts)When we know that Grok has been programmed to take everything it reports and first filter it through what Elon Musk's personal beliefs are. Grok literally gives a you an Elon Musk slant on everything.
newdeal2
(4,341 posts)Technically there was peace for a day. Maybe he can get a little gold star sticker.
MerryBlooms
(12,071 posts)Something about crossing yellow zone, but nothing concrete
Totally Tunsie
(11,351 posts)W_HAMILTON
(9,686 posts)Maru Kitteh
(30,825 posts)I think we all knew it was only ever going to be temporary. It was never a question of if, only when.
taxi
(2,580 posts)Tell me, how many peace prizes could someone rack up that much time?
malaise
(290,191 posts)Igel
(37,147 posts)There are multiple armed militant Islamic groups in Gaza. Could have been one of them. Israel's forbearing this violation so far, perhaps because of the grayness of the situation and eliminated the violation of the ceasefire. But documentation is building a case for terminating forbearance.
Then again, one side will listen to the first half of the news story and accept the second; the other will ignore the first half and claim that somehow it's all Israel's fault.
Consider these to have been compelled to abide by the terms of the ostensibly voluntary ceasefire. They're disarmed. Even if they're not Hamasites and didn't agree to the ceasefire--after all, Hamas is too busy imposing its armed rule, killing protestors and those who challenge its supremacy and authority to worry about disciplining allies and fellow-travelers.
malaise
(290,191 posts)That is all