General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTension over evidence builds between Comey team and federal prosecutors as January trial looms
When former FBI Director James Comey was charged last month, prosecutors werent ready or willing to turn over the criminal case file to his lawyers.
As of Tuesday, after days of disputing what case documents they have to provide, prosecutors handed his lawyers what they needed to, a person familiar with the case told CNN.
Still, the back and forth over discovery this week highlights the growing tension between prosecutors approach to the Comey case including these early attempts to delay turning over some evidence and Judge Michael Nachmanoffs efforts to get the former FBI director to trial in fewer than three months.
The brief but notable discovery standoff also has put more of a focus on the three weeks of leadership of interim Eastern District of Virginia US Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who has little courtroom experience but was named to the position by President Donald Trump, after she decided to override and sideline more experienced prosecutors who had doubts about the Comey case.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/tension-over-evidence-builds-between-214806646.html
Sounds like a mistrial in the making.

exboyfil
(18,309 posts)bucolic_frolic
(52,810 posts)There is a pattern, but its meaning seems a bit unclear.
no_hypocrisy
(53,430 posts)since law school.
LetMyPeopleVote
(171,474 posts)Accepting Lindsey Halligan's proposal, the judge wrote, would unnecessarily hinder and delay Defendants ability to adequately prepare for trial.
The judge wrote that the Trump DOJâs proposal âwould unnecessarily hinder and delay Defendantâs ability to adequately prepare for trial.â
— Lauren Ashley Davis (@laurenmeidasa.bsky.social) 2025-10-14T16:43:01.679Z
Comey wins early discovery fight as judge finds Trump DOJ stance would cause needless delay
www.yahoo.com/news/article...
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/comey-indictment-trump-doj-discovery-ruling-rcna237506
That reinforcement came from U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff, who rejected the Justice Departments motion for a protective order that wouldve limited Comeys access to discovery. The judge wrote that the Trump DOJs proposal would unnecessarily hinder and delay Defendants ability to adequately prepare for trial.
In a two-page order explaining his decision Monday, Nachmanoff, a Biden appointee sitting in the Eastern District of Virginia, noted that prior high-profile false statement cases didnt have the sort of limitations the government proposed here. The judge added that the DOJ proposal didnt sufficiently detail the information purportedly needing protection, thus making the request overbroad.
Though the decision on this one discrete issue doesnt dictate how the case will end (heftier pretrial motions to dismiss are due later this month), its on-task tone is in keeping with the one Nachmanoff set at Comeys arraignment last week, where the former lawman pleaded not guilty to the two-count indictment secured by former Trump personal lawyer Lindsey Halligan, over the objection of career prosecutors: one count for allegedly lying to Congress and another for allegedly obstructing Congress. At the arraignment, Nachmanoff approved a swift litigation schedule featuring a Jan. 5 trial date, which the judge said he had been prepared to set even sooner had the defense requested a December start date.
So whatever Halligans plan for the case is to the extent she has one, not having prosecuted a case before delay shouldnt be a part of it. Just before Comeys arraignment, she brought in two DOJ lawyers from North Carolina who have prosecuted cases before. She similarly secured an indictment last week against New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose prosecution Trump also called for like he did Comeys. James is due to appear in court Oct. 24.