Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(129,833 posts)
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 08:19 PM Tuesday

Tension over evidence builds between Comey team and federal prosecutors as January trial looms

When former FBI Director James Comey was charged last month, prosecutors weren’t ready or willing to turn over the criminal case file to his lawyers.

As of Tuesday, after days of disputing what case documents they have to provide, prosecutors handed his lawyers what they needed to, a person familiar with the case told CNN.

Still, the back and forth over discovery this week highlights the growing tension between prosecutors’ approach to the Comey case — including these early attempts to delay turning over some evidence — and Judge Michael Nachmanoff’s efforts to get the former FBI director to trial in fewer than three months.

The brief but notable discovery standoff also has put more of a focus on the three weeks of leadership of interim Eastern District of Virginia US Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who has little courtroom experience but was named to the position by President Donald Trump, after she decided to override and sideline more experienced prosecutors who had doubts about the Comey case.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/tension-over-evidence-builds-between-214806646.html

Sounds like a mistrial in the making.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tension over evidence builds between Comey team and federal prosecutors as January trial looms (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Tuesday OP
Brady violation exboyfil Tuesday #1
Are spurious cases a strategy to foster attacks on judges? bucolic_frolic Tuesday #2
Halligan likely hasn't read The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure no_hypocrisy Tuesday #3
Deadline Legal Blog-Comey wins early discovery fight as judge finds Trump DOJ stance would cause needless delay LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #4

bucolic_frolic

(52,810 posts)
2. Are spurious cases a strategy to foster attacks on judges?
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 08:27 PM
Tuesday

There is a pattern, but its meaning seems a bit unclear.

LetMyPeopleVote

(171,474 posts)
4. Deadline Legal Blog-Comey wins early discovery fight as judge finds Trump DOJ stance would cause needless delay
Tue Oct 14, 2025, 08:32 PM
Tuesday

Accepting Lindsey Halligan's proposal, the judge wrote, “would unnecessarily hinder and delay Defendant’s ability to adequately prepare for trial.”

The judge wrote that the Trump DOJ’s proposal “would unnecessarily hinder and delay Defendant’s ability to adequately prepare for trial.”

Comey wins early discovery fight as judge finds Trump DOJ stance would cause needless delay

www.yahoo.com/news/article...

Lauren Ashley Davis (@laurenmeidasa.bsky.social) 2025-10-14T16:43:01.679Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/comey-indictment-trump-doj-discovery-ruling-rcna237506

It’s early yet in the James Comey case, but the former FBI director got a quick win on a procedural issue that reinforces the presiding judge’s refusal to allow needless delay in the criminal case against the Donald Trump critic brought by a Trump-installed prosecutor.

That reinforcement came from U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff, who rejected the Justice Department’s motion for a protective order that would’ve limited Comey’s access to discovery. The judge wrote that the Trump DOJ’s proposal “would unnecessarily hinder and delay Defendant’s ability to adequately prepare for trial.”

In a two-page order explaining his decision Monday, Nachmanoff, a Biden appointee sitting in the Eastern District of Virginia, noted that prior high-profile false statement cases didn’t have the sort of limitations the government proposed here. The judge added that the DOJ proposal didn’t sufficiently detail the information purportedly needing protection, thus making the request overbroad.

Though the decision on this one discrete issue doesn’t dictate how the case will end (heftier pretrial motions to dismiss are due later this month), its on-task tone is in keeping with the one Nachmanoff set at Comey’s arraignment last week, where the former lawman pleaded not guilty to the two-count indictment secured by former Trump personal lawyer Lindsey Halligan, over the objection of career prosecutors: one count for allegedly lying to Congress and another for allegedly obstructing Congress. At the arraignment, Nachmanoff approved a swift litigation schedule featuring a Jan. 5 trial date, which the judge said he had been prepared to set even sooner had the defense requested a December start date.

So whatever Halligan’s plan for the case is — to the extent she has one, not having prosecuted a case before — delay shouldn’t be a part of it. Just before Comey’s arraignment, she brought in two DOJ lawyers from North Carolina who have prosecuted cases before. She similarly secured an indictment last week against New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose prosecution Trump also called for like he did Comey’s. James is due to appear in court Oct. 24.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tension over evidence bui...