Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Deadline Legal Blog-Grand jury rejection of Trump's 'law and order' spreads to Chicago ICE enforcement
It’s the latest example in Trump’s second term of what was previously an extremely rare phenomenon of grand jurors refusing to return indictments.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/chicago-ice-trump-grand-juries-indictments-law-order-rcna236391
Americans across the country from Washington to Los Angeles have made it clear that they reject the Trump administration’s notion of “law and order,” with grand jurors refusing to return indictments in a series of cases alleging assaults on law enforcement during protests. Now, as President Donald Trump agitates against Chicago in his Republican administration’s targeting of Democratic-run cities and states, federal grand jurors in Illinois have declined to approve charges against two people who were accused of assaulting agents in the Chicago area.
That led federal prosecutors in the Northern District of Illinois to move to dismiss the charges Wednesday. Immigration officials had touted the arrests in the case last month, writing on social media that the defendants “will be prosecuted and held accountable.”
While the facts of every case are different and grand jury deliberations are secret, the bottom-line pattern of these rejections is impossible to ignore. It’s difficult to overstate how rare it is for grand juries to reject indictments — yet, these days, it’s not so unusual in the Trump Justice Department. Whether grand jurors are finding that prosecutors are overcharging, or grand jurors are refusing to return indictments despite finding sufficient evidence to proceed — or some combination thereof — this ongoing phenomenon is one of the most remarkable developments of Trump’s second term.
The Illinois dismissal coincided with the arraignment of former FBI Director James Comey on Wednesday morning, whose charges Trump himself had demanded. In that case, led by an inexperienced former Trump personal lawyer over the objection of career prosecutors, Washington-area grand jurors in Northern Virginia rejected one of the three counts proposed by the administration. Comey pleaded not guilty.
That led federal prosecutors in the Northern District of Illinois to move to dismiss the charges Wednesday. Immigration officials had touted the arrests in the case last month, writing on social media that the defendants “will be prosecuted and held accountable.”
While the facts of every case are different and grand jury deliberations are secret, the bottom-line pattern of these rejections is impossible to ignore. It’s difficult to overstate how rare it is for grand juries to reject indictments — yet, these days, it’s not so unusual in the Trump Justice Department. Whether grand jurors are finding that prosecutors are overcharging, or grand jurors are refusing to return indictments despite finding sufficient evidence to proceed — or some combination thereof — this ongoing phenomenon is one of the most remarkable developments of Trump’s second term.
The Illinois dismissal coincided with the arraignment of former FBI Director James Comey on Wednesday morning, whose charges Trump himself had demanded. In that case, led by an inexperienced former Trump personal lawyer over the objection of career prosecutors, Washington-area grand jurors in Northern Virginia rejected one of the three counts proposed by the administration. Comey pleaded not guilty.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
