Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(65,704 posts)
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 08:21 PM Friday

"Pam Bondi found the loophole she needed."

Mike Masnick
‪@mmasnick.bsky.social‬

Pam Bondi found the loophole she needed.

‪Kyle Cheney‬
‪@kyledcheney.bsky.social‬
· 2h
JUST IN: The Justice Department's bid to relesae Epstein grand jury info comes with a huge caveat that it will seek to redact not just victim info but other "personal identifying information." storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

July 18, 2025 at 6:05 PM

Pam Bondi found the loophole she needed.

Mike Masnick (@mmasnick.bsky.social) 2025-07-18T22:05:22.351Z
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gab13by13

(28,889 posts)
1. A judge should not release the transcripts
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 08:26 PM
Friday

The reason for the release that the people want to know is not good enough to violate the secrecy of grand jury testimony.

pat_k

(11,474 posts)
5. It's all an empty gesture intended to placate and blame shift...
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 08:43 PM
Friday

1) As far as I can tell, no exception under which the secrecy of grand jury testimony is pierced applies here

2) Grand jury testimony is limited and focuses on providing grounds for the indictment(s) sought. They were not out to indict clients, so evidence identifying or related to specific clients isn't likely to be there.

3) This request for redaction makes it an even emptier gesture. In the incredibly unlikely case that the motion to release were granted, this is a backstop to ensure no client information (unlikely to be there at all anyway) is released.

They are banking that the motion will be denied. The company line will then be that they tried to release "it all" (utter bullshit) but the corrupt judiciary, not the regime, is keeping it secret.

rsdsharp

(11,078 posts)
6. The loophole is Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6e.
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 08:50 PM
Friday

She knows there are two chances the court will authorize the release with proceedings still pending in the Maxwell case: Slim and None, and Slim’s dead, and None’s living in Nebraska.

choie

(5,837 posts)
8. The grand jury surrounded Ghislaine, not trump
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 09:05 PM
Friday

So most likely he's not in the Grand Jury proceedings. I hope people understand that.

LetMyPeopleVote

(166,502 posts)
9. Justice Dept. asks court to release Epstein grand jury testimony
Sat Jul 19, 2025, 04:26 PM
Saturday

This is a stunt which would not include the vast majority of the file on Epstein. First, it is highly unlikely that the court will release these files given the appeal by Maxwell. The material in these transcripts are a very tiny part of the material in the FBI/DOJ possession.

This is a stunt to try to take pressure off trump.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/07/18/bondi-epstein-files-documents-grand-jury-testimony-doj/

The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal court to release grand jury transcripts connected to deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein, responding to a growing political outcry over the agency’s unfulfilled promise to release more details on the government’s investigation of his alleged sex-trafficking of minors......

A judge would have to agree to release them, a process that could take weeks or months. Even then, their disclosure is by no means certain. Grand jury records are shielded by secrecy rules to protect crime victims, witnesses and the accused, and are made public only under limited circumstances......

The sealed transcripts would constitute only a fraction of the evidence and investigative material that the FBI amassed during its years-long investigation. The transcripts are unlikely to fully satisfy Trump’s right-wing base, which continues to call for full transparency surrounding the investigation.

“It is generally a very, very small portion of any investigative file,” said Christopher O’Leary, who spent more than two decades as an FBI counterterrorism agent.

The full extent of what remains under wraps is unclear. Thousands of pages of documents related to the Epstein investigation have already been released through lawsuits, court filings, public records requests and the Justice Department’s prosecution of Maxwell......

As recently as last year, the younger Comey had sought in court to keep records pertaining to some aspects of the Epstein investigation under wraps in a suit brought by the gossip website Radar Online seeking FBI records. Comey pushed against making those documents public in a January 2024 court filing, saying it could interfere with Maxwell’s ongoing appeal of her conviction and subject victims and witnesses to “embarrassment and potential harassment.”
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Pam Bondi found the loop...