Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
York College Prof. Jacqueline Beatty on the would-be "Protector-In-Chief"
Donald Trump, "protector" of women: This deeply sexist notion has a long legal historyTrump's version of insecure masculinity demands a weak, submissive woman, who must be protected — and controlled
https://mediaproxy.salon.com/width/1200/
“I am your protector,” Donald Trump declared to women voters at a Sept. 23 rally in western Pennsylvania. “You will no longer be abandoned, lonely or scared. You will no longer be in danger. … You will be protected and I will be your protector.” Clips of this moment went viral on social media, and cable news hosts laughed derisively. As a historian of early American women and gender, however, I saw the deep and troubling roots of this rhetoric.
As polls increasingly find a widening gender gap between Trump and Kamala Harris among women voters, his campaign has made overt appeals to white suburban women.
They aren’t subtle.
At the same Pennsylvania rally, Trump claimed that his second term would offer protection for women “at the border, on the sidewalks of your now violent cities, in the suburbs where you are under migrant criminal siege, and with our military protecting you from foreign enemies.” He invoked an insecure masculinity rooted in the use of violence against real or often perceived threats, which requires a submissive, helpless, vulnerable woman to protect in order to validate its existence. In other words, to legitimate this brand of manhood, there must be a woman (or women) to protect. It’s a gendered performance that women of our historical moment, and of centuries past, know well.
As polls increasingly find a widening gender gap between Trump and Kamala Harris among women voters, his campaign has made overt appeals to white suburban women.
They aren’t subtle.
At the same Pennsylvania rally, Trump claimed that his second term would offer protection for women “at the border, on the sidewalks of your now violent cities, in the suburbs where you are under migrant criminal siege, and with our military protecting you from foreign enemies.” He invoked an insecure masculinity rooted in the use of violence against real or often perceived threats, which requires a submissive, helpless, vulnerable woman to protect in order to validate its existence. In other words, to legitimate this brand of manhood, there must be a woman (or women) to protect. It’s a gendered performance that women of our historical moment, and of centuries past, know well.
https://www.salon.com/2024/10/13/donald-trump-protector-of-women-this-deeply-sexist-notion-has-a-long-legal-history/
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
