Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden's Trump Card on Impeachment
https://politicalwire.com/2023/09/12/bidens-trump-card-on-impeachment/Bidens Trump Card on Impeachment
September 12, 2023 at 5:53 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard
Politico: In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion issued by the Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosis decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it.
Not only is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesdays announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
That opinion issued by the Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosis decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it.
Not only is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesdays announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Biden's Trump Card on Impeachment (Original Post)
babylonsister
Sep 2023
OP
BOSSHOG
(43,969 posts)1. Votes? We don't need no stinking votes
Itd be kinda nice if the Speaker of the fucking House of Representatives had a little knowledge of governance.
Frasier Balzov
(4,667 posts)2. What does "invalid" mean in this context?
That Congressional subpoenas are unenforceable?
Cha
(315,377 posts)3. Does Stupid Kev even know
the rules?
ChoppinBroccoli
(3,900 posts)4. Yeah, They Need GROUNDS To Impeach Too
But that won't stop them either.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)5. Excellent. nt
littlemissmartypants
(30,721 posts)6. Link to the original Politico article...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trumps DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The departments 2020 opinion around Trumps impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
A 2020 opinion by the Donald Trump-led Justice Department could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.
By KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
09/12/2023 05:28 PM EDT
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the Houses new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion issued by the Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosis decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesdays announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony, wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJs Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administrations rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect, Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded in his 54-page opinion.
Snip...
❤️
How Donald Trumps DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The departments 2020 opinion around Trumps impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
A 2020 opinion by the Donald Trump-led Justice Department could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.
By KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
09/12/2023 05:28 PM EDT
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the Houses new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion issued by the Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosis decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesdays announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony, wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJs Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administrations rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect, Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded in his 54-page opinion.
Snip...
❤️