Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGifts to Supreme Court justices should be limited to
Tim Dickinson: Gifts to Supreme Court justices should be limited to those that were in "common use" in the 18th century.
11:45 AM · Aug 10, 2023
Link to tweet
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gifts to Supreme Court justices should be limited to (Original Post)
zuul
Aug 2023
OP
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,861 posts)1. So, slaves, then. NT
NONE.
bucolic_frolic
(55,146 posts)3. Half pint of grog and a quill pen
haele
(15,404 posts)6. Nah, a bottle of Madeira (that's what bankrupted Jefferson) and a pair....
Of fine dueling pistols from Scotland, where they mastered the art of hair triggers.
Silver candlesticks and clocks were also considered welcome expensive gifts in the late 18th/early 19th century.
Maybe a matched pair of carriage horses if one is being really extravagant.
Of all the gifts mentioned, a good, new pair of balanced dueling pistols from Scotland or France were on average the most expensive.
Haele
Bayard
(29,707 posts)4. At the least,
There should be a documented, running total, like other officials (such as those at the White House), have to report.
Wicked Blue
(8,868 posts)5. Chamber pots
for their chambers