Trump's Election Defense: Sway One Juror With 'Reasonable Doubt'

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

(Bloomberg) -- Donald Trump’s indictment over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election is the biggest challenge yet for his squad of lawyers, who’ve been hitting the airwaves to preview defenses for what could eventually be the most consequential criminal trial in US history.

If Trump’s legal team can raise reasonable doubt in the mind of one juror — by blaming his lawyers or arguing that his false claims of election fraud were protected by the First Amendment, for example — the case brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith would collapse, forcing the government to choose between dropping the charges or retrying Trump.

Legal experts say the defenses are all long-shots, but not impossible. Trump’s attorney John Lauro has signaled that reasonable doubt is central to his strategy.

“The government, the Biden administration, would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump did not believe that he had won the election,” Lauro said on NBC’s Meet the Press on Aug. 6. “They will never be able to do that. And that’s why this prosecution is so ill-conceived.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-election-defense-sway-one-150405271.html

Trying for a mistrial. It can still be relitigated if Jack Smith decides to.

[RockRaven]

1. Sway one MAGAt juror with jury nullification...

"If our god-king does it, it's not illegal"

[viva la]

2. So if it's like 11-1 or 10-2, USA can try again?

What a prospect, but better than an "acquittal".

[emulatorloo]

3. Yes government can retry if there is a hung jury, as OP notes.

Lauro seems rather overconfident to me. Aka full of false bravado and bullshit. Additionally he has a fool for a client, who won’t stop incriminating himself.

[underpants]

4. Hans?

[tinrobot]

5. "Sway" or "Bribe"?

Because you know if they can get to a juror, they'll try it.