General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat if judge Aileen Cannon dismisses Trump's case?
I know. No one expects that, even from her.
But if she did, she could only be removed from the bench by impeachment by the House and trial by the Senate.
This will never happen with our current Congress so she could eliminate the case without fear of losing her job.
--
(fixed her name in the title)
Marius25
(3,213 posts)Not sure if the 11th Circuit can step in or not.
Kingofalldems
(39,946 posts)why did you say Trump gets away with espionage?
Fucking tiresome.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)To delay or prevent accountability.
FloridaBlues
(4,627 posts)OAITW r.2.0
(30,798 posts)and I think she will be removed if a pic gets out that she was on the Trump train to screw this country,
Smith can challenge.
FrankBooth
(1,844 posts)And the 11th Circuit shuts Aileen down again, just like they did before.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(16,294 posts)just like the last time they slapped her down, and this was from Benedict appointed judges.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)Dismissing or sabotaging a criminal trial seems more problematic.
MarineCombatEngineer
(16,294 posts)I don't think she'll try any of her shenanigans again, this time, IMHO, the 11th will hammer her if she tries to interfere again.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(16,294 posts)but, again, IMHO, there is a sea change in the air and it's going against Benedict, yes, there are those that will stick with him no matter what, but he is losing the Independant vote, plus the suburban vote and as more and more of his crimes come out, it's my belief that he's done for.
Sgent
(5,858 posts)a jury is empaneled and gives a directed verdict there is no effective appeal. The DOJ could appeal her ruling for posterity but it is moot since Trump couldn't be retried after jeopardy attached.
captain queeg
(11,780 posts)Shed go down in history as a shame to the judiciary. On the other hand if she just does her job in what is an open a shut case she could go down in history for presiding over the first time an ex president is convicted of a crime, and shown in a positive light in the future.
dpibel
(3,693 posts)"In a criminal case an appeal by the United States shall lie to a court of appeals from a decision, judgment, or order of a district court dismissing an indictment or information or granting a new trial after verdict or judgment, as to any one or more counts, or any part thereof, except that no appeal shall lie where the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution prohibits further prosecution."
If there's been no trial and no verdict, there's no double jeopardy issue.
So Aileen can try again to intervene for her hero. No guarantees, but I wouldn't bet against the appellate court slapping her silly again if she tries a groundless dismissal.
WarGamer
(18,052 posts)She'll help by granting every scheduling change Trump wants... kicking the can waaaaay down the road.
Every motion Trump introduces, she'll consider it for a month.
Stuff like that.
Kingofalldems
(39,946 posts)WarGamer
(18,052 posts)Since NONE of this has ever been tried before vs a Former or sitting US POTUS, there will be LOTS of opportunities for higher Courts to rule on normal Courtroom motions.
No precedent... it all has to be done from scratch.
Example: If Trump files a motion to quash the indictment... what's next? What does Cannon do? Then the 11th Circuit? SCOTUS?
Kingofalldems
(39,946 posts)That's what I am reading.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)Kingofalldems
(39,946 posts)Should we give up and just let him take over?
Marius25
(3,213 posts)For the rich and powerful.
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #15)
Marius25 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #15)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)It could take months to just get his attorneys security clearances, then he dismisses the legal team and we start this all over again.
Bev54
(12,977 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)Its so insane shes allowed to be involved.
llmart
(16,989 posts)He didn't have to go with Florida according to one legal expert on ABC.
Response to llmart (Reply #20)
Marius25 This message was self-deleted by its author.
MarineCombatEngineer
(16,294 posts)I'll trust SC Smith to know what he's doing, so far, he seems to be doing a hell of a job.
llmart
(16,989 posts)I was just wondering why he might have chosen that. It was not a criticism of him at all. I never said I "knew better" than him or that it was a mistake.
EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)are saying that it was smart because it avoids the conflict of venue, and the delay that would cause. Who knew that Cannon would show up.
Jack told us in his press conference that he is seeking a speedy trial, which shows me that he is totally aware of the stakes.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)tenderfoot
(8,982 posts)EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)Well, we got to enjoy the indictment for one day until Cannon returned, like a specter haunting us. Midas Touch says no worries, but others say differently. It does seem odd that the very first judge is also on the paper there, so maybe it is just a perfunctory step. I no longer hold out hope that he'll have to wear an ankle bracelet, if she is on the case day one. He'll walk in and walk out. Probably keep his passport, too.
Also, I think that the loss of his two attorneys will be used for delay, no matter who the judge is. This was Bundy's advice to--who was it? Another notorious serial killer. Just fire your attorney to get a delay.
Now, I think they got fired because Trump said he was reassured that he was going to skate, when he got whopped upside the head by this indictment. But, someone has to be sacrificed, and this is his MO to delay. The plan is to delay until he is protected by his candidacy. Which will happen.
I am enjoying the commentary on Jack, who I find comforting, in my weakness. I feel that if he can't do it, nobody can. He'll do his best, which is considerable.
I heard one commentator state that Cannon is highly respected.
Mme. Defarge
(8,815 posts)like Michelle Bachman. Gives me the creeps.
That said, I trust Jack Smith and his venue decision.