Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kablooie

(18,998 posts)
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:24 PM Jun 2023

What if judge Aileen Cannon dismisses Trump's case?

I know. No one expects that, even from her.

But if she did, she could only be removed from the bench by impeachment by the House and trial by the Senate.
This will never happen with our current Congress so she could eliminate the case without fear of losing her job.

--
(fixed her name in the title)

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What if judge Aileen Cannon dismisses Trump's case? (Original Post) Kablooie Jun 2023 OP
Aileen, and it means the case is dismissed and Trump gets away with espionage Marius25 Jun 2023 #1
So if you are not sure - Kingofalldems Jun 2023 #11
You should find it tiresome that Trump always finds ways Marius25 Jun 2023 #16
I think the 11 circuit court could ask her to be removed also DOJ could request her to removed FloridaBlues Jun 2023 #2
I believe you are correct..... OAITW r.2.0 Jun 2023 #5
Yes MFM008 Jun 2023 #39
Then DOJ appeals FrankBooth Jun 2023 #3
Can the 11th Circuit overturn a dismissal of the charges? Marius25 Jun 2023 #4
Yes TexasDem69 Jun 2023 #6
Absolutely they can, and will, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2023 #22
They slapped her down before over the special master Marius25 Jun 2023 #23
With the intense scrutiny and with her being humiliated by the 11th last time, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2023 #25
I'm just so disgusted she's involved. It's causing me a lot of stress. Marius25 Jun 2023 #26
I understand what you're saying, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2023 #27
If she waits until Sgent Jun 2023 #37
It's hard to imagine but not impossible captain queeg Jun 2023 #7
Pretty sure that's appealable dpibel Jun 2023 #8
That's not how she'll help him. WarGamer Jun 2023 #9
I thought you posted that the SC will step in? Kingofalldems Jun 2023 #13
I explained it before but I'll explain it again now for you. WarGamer Jun 2023 #14
So either way Trump wins? Kingofalldems Jun 2023 #15
He usually does. He's gotten away with most things for his whole life Marius25 Jun 2023 #17
Ahh, now I get it. Kingofalldems Jun 2023 #29
No. But be realistic and realize there isn't real justice in America Marius25 Jun 2023 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Marius25 Jun 2023 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Jun 2023 #19
Yep she could kick it down the road for years grantcart Jun 2023 #31
I am not going down that road, I really don't think she will. Bev54 Jun 2023 #10
MSNBC lawyers saying she could really damage this case Marius25 Jun 2023 #12
Which makes me wonder why Smith chose Florida over D.C. llmart Jun 2023 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Marius25 Jun 2023 #21
So you think you know better the SC Smith? MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2023 #24
Why so snarky? It's uncalled for. llmart Jun 2023 #28
Well, many commentators EndlessWire Jun 2023 #33
Par for the Trump course. sarcasmo Jun 2023 #35
Sow those seeds of doubt tenderfoot Jun 2023 #38
It's like a bad plot twist. EndlessWire Jun 2023 #32
She has crazy eyes Mme. Defarge Jun 2023 #34
she wont be presiding this case sadasfyed Jun 2023 #36
 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
1. Aileen, and it means the case is dismissed and Trump gets away with espionage
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:25 PM
Jun 2023

Not sure if the 11th Circuit can step in or not.

Kingofalldems

(39,946 posts)
11. So if you are not sure -
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:53 PM
Jun 2023

why did you say Trump gets away with espionage?

Fucking tiresome.

 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
16. You should find it tiresome that Trump always finds ways
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:58 PM
Jun 2023

To delay or prevent accountability.

FloridaBlues

(4,627 posts)
2. I think the 11 circuit court could ask her to be removed also DOJ could request her to removed
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:29 PM
Jun 2023

OAITW r.2.0

(30,798 posts)
5. I believe you are correct.....
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:35 PM
Jun 2023

and I think she will be removed if a pic gets out that she was on the Trump train to screw this country,

MarineCombatEngineer

(16,294 posts)
22. Absolutely they can, and will,
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:10 PM
Jun 2023

just like the last time they slapped her down, and this was from Benedict appointed judges.

 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
23. They slapped her down before over the special master
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:12 PM
Jun 2023

Dismissing or sabotaging a criminal trial seems more problematic.

MarineCombatEngineer

(16,294 posts)
25. With the intense scrutiny and with her being humiliated by the 11th last time,
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:15 PM
Jun 2023

I don't think she'll try any of her shenanigans again, this time, IMHO, the 11th will hammer her if she tries to interfere again.

MarineCombatEngineer

(16,294 posts)
27. I understand what you're saying,
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:20 PM
Jun 2023

but, again, IMHO, there is a sea change in the air and it's going against Benedict, yes, there are those that will stick with him no matter what, but he is losing the Independant vote, plus the suburban vote and as more and more of his crimes come out, it's my belief that he's done for.

Sgent

(5,858 posts)
37. If she waits until
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 11:52 PM
Jun 2023

a jury is empaneled and gives a directed verdict there is no effective appeal. The DOJ could appeal her ruling for posterity but it is moot since Trump couldn't be retried after jeopardy attached.

captain queeg

(11,780 posts)
7. It's hard to imagine but not impossible
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:37 PM
Jun 2023

She’d go down in history as a shame to the judiciary. On the other hand if she just does her job in what is an open a shut case she could go down in history for presiding over the first time an ex president is convicted of a crime, and shown in a positive light in the future.

dpibel

(3,693 posts)
8. Pretty sure that's appealable
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:38 PM
Jun 2023

"In a criminal case an appeal by the United States shall lie to a court of appeals from a decision, judgment, or order of a district court dismissing an indictment or information or granting a new trial after verdict or judgment, as to any one or more counts, or any part thereof, except that no appeal shall lie where the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution prohibits further prosecution."

If there's been no trial and no verdict, there's no double jeopardy issue.

So Aileen can try again to intervene for her hero. No guarantees, but I wouldn't bet against the appellate court slapping her silly again if she tries a groundless dismissal.

WarGamer

(18,052 posts)
9. That's not how she'll help him.
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:41 PM
Jun 2023

She'll help by granting every scheduling change Trump wants... kicking the can waaaaay down the road.

Every motion Trump introduces, she'll consider it for a month.

Stuff like that.

WarGamer

(18,052 posts)
14. I explained it before but I'll explain it again now for you.
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:56 PM
Jun 2023

Since NONE of this has ever been tried before vs a Former or sitting US POTUS, there will be LOTS of opportunities for higher Courts to rule on normal Courtroom motions.

No precedent... it all has to be done from scratch.

Example: If Trump files a motion to quash the indictment... what's next? What does Cannon do? Then the 11th Circuit? SCOTUS?
 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
30. No. But be realistic and realize there isn't real justice in America
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:29 PM
Jun 2023

For the rich and powerful.

Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #15)

Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #15)

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
31. Yep she could kick it down the road for years
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:33 PM
Jun 2023


It could take months to just get his attorneys security clearances, then he dismisses the legal team and we start this all over again.
 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
12. MSNBC lawyers saying she could really damage this case
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 09:53 PM
Jun 2023

It’s so insane she’s allowed to be involved.

llmart

(16,989 posts)
20. Which makes me wonder why Smith chose Florida over D.C.
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:01 PM
Jun 2023

He didn't have to go with Florida according to one legal expert on ABC.

Response to llmart (Reply #20)

MarineCombatEngineer

(16,294 posts)
24. So you think you know better the SC Smith?
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:12 PM
Jun 2023

I'll trust SC Smith to know what he's doing, so far, he seems to be doing a hell of a job.

llmart

(16,989 posts)
28. Why so snarky? It's uncalled for.
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:22 PM
Jun 2023

I was just wondering why he might have chosen that. It was not a criticism of him at all. I never said I "knew better" than him or that it was a mistake.

EndlessWire

(8,103 posts)
33. Well, many commentators
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:47 PM
Jun 2023

are saying that it was smart because it avoids the conflict of venue, and the delay that would cause. Who knew that Cannon would show up.

Jack told us in his press conference that he is seeking a speedy trial, which shows me that he is totally aware of the stakes.

EndlessWire

(8,103 posts)
32. It's like a bad plot twist.
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:41 PM
Jun 2023

Well, we got to enjoy the indictment for one day until Cannon returned, like a specter haunting us. Midas Touch says no worries, but others say differently. It does seem odd that the very first judge is also on the paper there, so maybe it is just a perfunctory step. I no longer hold out hope that he'll have to wear an ankle bracelet, if she is on the case day one. He'll walk in and walk out. Probably keep his passport, too.

Also, I think that the loss of his two attorneys will be used for delay, no matter who the judge is. This was Bundy's advice to--who was it? Another notorious serial killer. Just fire your attorney to get a delay.

Now, I think they got fired because Trump said he was reassured that he was going to skate, when he got whopped upside the head by this indictment. But, someone has to be sacrificed, and this is his MO to delay. The plan is to delay until he is protected by his candidacy. Which will happen.

I am enjoying the commentary on Jack, who I find comforting, in my weakness. I feel that if he can't do it, nobody can. He'll do his best, which is considerable.

I heard one commentator state that Cannon is highly respected.

Mme. Defarge

(8,815 posts)
34. She has crazy eyes
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:55 PM
Jun 2023

like Michelle Bachman. Gives me the creeps.

That said, I trust Jack Smith and his venue decision.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What if judge Aileen Cann...