General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Jack Smith real?????
Last edited Mon May 1, 2023, 03:10 PM - Edit history (2)
I find it fascinating that I have never seen a contemporary photo of Jack Smith other than the one in his legal robes at The Hague. No quick snaps of him moving from a limo to a restaurant. Nothing.
I've never heard his voice. Never seen a quote.
I do admire whatever he's doing to maintain his distance far from the madding crowd.
Have any of you seen or heard more?
Edit: I put in the subject, but it's not there. Is that a thing?
Edit 2: In the above edit I tried to say "I put (open angle bracket) sarcasm (close angle bracket) in the subject. But it's not there.. Obviously there's a rule. Can someone explain?

Response to LAS14 (Original post)
emulatorloo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to LAS14 (Original post)
Tetrachloride This message was self-deleted by its author.
LuckyCharms
(20,690 posts)LAS14
(15,338 posts)LuckyCharms
(20,690 posts)His voice probably hasn't changed that much.
He's in his early 50's now, early 40's when that video was shot.
LAS14
(15,338 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)and women's get deeper.
Noticed this from Hillary videos when younger vs. now, and from some men recorded both now and earlier.
Javaman
(64,577 posts)
LetMyPeopleVote
(170,633 posts)Right now, most of Special Counsel's pleadings/filings are under seal due to grand jury secrecy. However, Jack Smith has been busy as seen by Pence testifying and various subpoenas such this one
Link to tweet
imanamerican63
(15,464 posts)Because it means he has his nose to the ground and investing his time in the task at hand. He isnt going to publicize for the sake of the investigation.
betsuni
(28,396 posts)Limo, swanky restaurant: ELITE! CORRUPT! ESTABLISHMENT! CANAPES! CHAMPAGNE COCKTAILS! EXPENSIVE SOFT FRENCH CHEESES! RIGGED! OLIGARCHS! FAKE NEWS!
treestar
(82,383 posts)
they're all part of it

Tommy Carcetti
(44,250 posts)
LAS14
(15,338 posts)Poiuyt
(18,272 posts)MineralMan
(149,852 posts)him is totally irrelevant, it seems to me. What also seems to me to be the case is that you're hunting for yet another way to diss the Justice Department.
See, I've not seen nor heard you say anything good about it ever. Maybe you can claim that you have, but I've never heard it or seen it. Same argument, see?
LAS14
(15,338 posts)"I do admire whatever he's doing to maintain his distance far from the madding crowd."
This was meant to be in praise of Smith's ability to stay out of the limelight and do his job.
When you say "yet another way," are you directing that to me, personally????? I've never "dissed" the justice department. I have no desire to. Perhaps you've got me mixed up with someone else?
senseandsensibility
(24,015 posts)you're making and didn't read anything else into it. Mueller was VERY circumspect
during his investigation, and yet he was seen occasionally in contemporary photos or even short remarks. I, too, think it's odd. Suspicious? No, just odd.
CatWoman
(80,162 posts)senseandsensibility
(24,015 posts)I remember years ago I mildly criticized Keith Olberman (who I like) and I was accused of every hidden motive under the sun.
LAS14
(15,338 posts)... people are absolutely sure about hidden motives.