General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox gets to continue its modus operandi; lying to its bank.
That model has worked for thousands of years. I guess people can't handle the truth that they've been duped.
Let's face it, what some of us find preposterous, others find satisfying.
Ugh.

Ocelot II
(127,703 posts)I thought modern banking was invented by the Medicis in the fourteenth century. So that's not even a single thousand of years. And cable tv is even newer!
cachukis
(3,476 posts)And there have been money lenders as long as there has been money. Wasn't there an episode in one of those jesus stories where he clashed with the money lenders?
Celerity
(52,487 posts)It is impossible to say exactly when banking properly began. We do, however, have evidence that it may have started to properly occur around 8000 BC, although these were not banking in the way that we see things now. It was more record keeping of trades that were being made. There may have been specific institutions developed specifically for banking, but we cant possibly know for sure. All we have records of are people making trades and record their trades down in a log.
THE EARLIEST PROPER BANKS
The first proper banks would have sprung up in ancient Mesopotamia. We have evidence that there were temples and palaces throughout Babylonia and other cities which provided lending activities. Although, a lot of this was not in the form of financial lending. Instead, banks would lend out seeds and the like. The idea is that by lending out seeds, farmers would have products that they could work with. When it came to the harvest, the farmers would pay back their seed loan from the harvest.
There are also records of credit from around this time. In fact, we have a history of credit and other banking activities throughout Asian civilization. The Temple of Artemis, for example, was a deposit for cash and there were records of debts held here. Mark Anthony plays a major role in these banks. He is said to have stolen cash from these banks.
BANKS DURING THE MEDIEVAL PERIOD
Banks really started to come into their own during the medieval period. Most of these banks were merchant banks, however. Again, this was a lot about crop loan and for financing expeditions across the silk routes. Some of the earliest forms of brokering took place in these banks. It is actually from around this time that bankruptcy started to spring up. The earliest banks were in Italy. Bankrupt comes from the word banca rotta in Italian. When a trade failed to deliver on their promised route, then they would have been declared banca rotta.
Ocelot II
(127,703 posts)
claudette
(5,455 posts)lie about a private company and sue them and WIN
cachukis
(3,476 posts)claudette
(5,455 posts)free
cachukis
(3,476 posts)wordsmithing of the fox acceptance of the settlement.
Omission is in it's own way, a lie.
We can listen to the pundits explain to us that fox has been penalized, but the fox viewers need their fix.
They are not seeking contradiction to their self indulgence.
That's my point. Fox has a boiler plate methodology and will present every escape excuse to maintain revenues.
There are institutions that have managed a long time doing the same thing.
malaise
(290,058 posts)That is all
cachukis
(3,476 posts)viewers about subjects not favorable to their story line. My experience shows they have not heard about so much that we are aware of.
Realize that while they rule cable audience numbers, most followers share what they hear with family and friends. It is the gist and the anecdotes that fill the conversations.
There is a large population ignorant to the significance of fox losing.
They are not reading newspapers, they are not watching CNN or MSNBC nor PBS. They watch fox.
They will stay with fox even after they try Newsmax and OAN. People cannot give up a habit. They have to replace it. They are not going to replace it with the New York Times.
The fox stars are not being dragged through the truth on fox.
Yea, they lost big. They lied and got caught and have to pay big bucks. But their viewers eyes have no place to go, but fox.
malaise
(290,058 posts)and Fux sure wasnt going to cover it.
cachukis
(3,476 posts)palpable.
Fox has to pay, yes, but we all pay because of their lies.
Thankfully, they have not captured the younger audiences. We need to use this settlement in our conversations with our youngsters and ask them to verify with evidence what we are talking about.
malaise
(290,058 posts)What continues to baffle me is why the American right welcomes the most racist and divisive scumbags from foreign countries - folks like Murdoch and Musk.
One more thing, Fux should be banned from WH press conferences.
cachukis
(3,476 posts)right more than the left.
Money makers often sell their souls.
Their are two types of leaders; transactional and transformative.
Transactions are win/lose. Transformations are evolutionary.
Jack Welch was an inspiration to the right, MLK Jr. an inspiration to the left.
I don't know if the data shows my thinking as accurate, but I played in the business world for 20 plus years and in academia for 15.
malaise
(290,058 posts)I think greed and hubris eventually destroys all empires