General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYa know what nobody's talking about? Nobody's talking about Pootie" nukes moving to Belarus
No one is because of Motherfucker and indictment watch. Meanwhile, there's this:
Putin: Russia to station nuclear weapons in Belarus
Published
3 hours ago
Russia will station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, President Vladimir Putin has said.
President Putin said the move would not violate nuclear non-proliferation agreements and compared it to the US stationing its weapons in Europe, according to Russian state media. Moscow would not be transferring control of its arms to Minsk, he added.
The US said it did not believe Russia was preparing to use the nuclear weapons after the announcement.
"We have not seen any reason to adjust our own strategic nuclear posture," the US Defense Department said in a statement.
"We remain committed to the collective defense of the Nato alliance."

RainCaster
(13,179 posts)... for the half life of those weapons.
They have a corrupt and failed economy.
ShazzieB
(21,771 posts)Also, I hear the guy who runs that country is a real loser. 😉
enid602
(9,563 posts)Russia's economy (in terms of GDP) rates right below Chile, with its 13 million inhabitants.
I wonder if Russia has maintained all those nukes all these years. They certainly did not maintain their army or armaments.
RockRaven
(18,170 posts)Gotta secure the nukes, right? How can anyone object to keeping nukes out of the hands of Belarusian rioters?
roamer65
(37,805 posts)We should do so immediately.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Zorro
(18,020 posts)Steven Maurer
(509 posts)We don't generally pay attention to North Korea's near-weekly nuclear threats either for about the same reason.
TuskMoar
(87 posts)Doesn't the I in ICBM stand for Intercontinental? If so, what difference does it make if they are in Belarus?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)They said tactical eg short range.