Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 'Twitter Files' Is What It Claims to Expose
(in other words, pretentious hypocrisy CONTINUES to be the hallmark of Republicans)https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/12/twitter-files-explained-elon-musk-taibbi-weiss-hunter-biden-laptop.html
. . .
Specifically, Musk delivered a vast trove of internal Twitter documents to two independent journalists, Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss, who have long endorsed aspects of the GOPs indictment of the platform. Taibbi and Weiss proceeded to publish a pair of exposés on Twitters inner workings. Dubbed the Twitter Files, these reports featured a couple genuinely concerning findings about pre-Musk Twitters operations. But they were also saturated in hyperbole, marred by omissions of context, and discredited by instances of outright mendacity. Musks commentary on the Twitter Files, meanwhile, proved even more demagogic and deceptive than the exposés themselves.
For these reasons, the Twitter Files are best understood as an egregious example of the very phenomenon it purports to condemn that of social media managers leveraging their platforms for partisan ends.
Everything you probably dont need to know about Hunter Bidens laptop.
The first installment of the Twitter Files concerned the social media platforms suppression of an October 2020 New York Post article about emails ostensibly recovered from Hunter Bidens laptop. To appreciate how unhinged the conservative narrative about the Twitter Files is, and how irresponsible Musks presentation of them has been, one must first understand the flimsiness of the article that kicked off the whole controversy.
In the Posts telling, the emails on Hunter Bidens laptop contained dispositive evidence that Joe Biden had used his power as vice president in 2015 to advance the interests of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural gas company that had employed Hunter Biden. In the conservative medias account, meanwhile, Hunters laptop from Hell proved that Joe Biden had engaged in acts of corruption so wanton, they made Donald Trump look like Ralph Nader.
In reality, neither the Posts reporting nor any subsequent investigations of Hunter Bidens laptop, or his relationship with Burisma has documented a single instance in which Joe Biden used public power to aid his sons private interests.
Specifically, Musk delivered a vast trove of internal Twitter documents to two independent journalists, Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss, who have long endorsed aspects of the GOPs indictment of the platform. Taibbi and Weiss proceeded to publish a pair of exposés on Twitters inner workings. Dubbed the Twitter Files, these reports featured a couple genuinely concerning findings about pre-Musk Twitters operations. But they were also saturated in hyperbole, marred by omissions of context, and discredited by instances of outright mendacity. Musks commentary on the Twitter Files, meanwhile, proved even more demagogic and deceptive than the exposés themselves.
For these reasons, the Twitter Files are best understood as an egregious example of the very phenomenon it purports to condemn that of social media managers leveraging their platforms for partisan ends.
Everything you probably dont need to know about Hunter Bidens laptop.
The first installment of the Twitter Files concerned the social media platforms suppression of an October 2020 New York Post article about emails ostensibly recovered from Hunter Bidens laptop. To appreciate how unhinged the conservative narrative about the Twitter Files is, and how irresponsible Musks presentation of them has been, one must first understand the flimsiness of the article that kicked off the whole controversy.
In the Posts telling, the emails on Hunter Bidens laptop contained dispositive evidence that Joe Biden had used his power as vice president in 2015 to advance the interests of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural gas company that had employed Hunter Biden. In the conservative medias account, meanwhile, Hunters laptop from Hell proved that Joe Biden had engaged in acts of corruption so wanton, they made Donald Trump look like Ralph Nader.
In reality, neither the Posts reporting nor any subsequent investigations of Hunter Bidens laptop, or his relationship with Burisma has documented a single instance in which Joe Biden used public power to aid his sons private interests.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The 'Twitter Files' Is What It Claims to Expose (Original Post)
CousinIT
Dec 2022
OP
Walleye
(42,775 posts)1. Major flaw in this whole thing: the vice president has no power at all
The vice president carries out the presidents policies, period. Spiro Agnews crimes were before he was vice president.
niyad
(127,878 posts)2. "the twitter flies" is what I see every time. I think I need more caffeine.