General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat happens to the judges appointed by a president convicted of sedition?
I think this is something that needs to be discussed.
Don't know the remedy, but do we just pretend they have legitimacy?

MineralMan
(149,852 posts)Federal judges, right up to the SCOTUS, can only be removed by impeachment and conviction by Congress.
Irish_Dem
(75,697 posts)Nothing.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)
Ocelot II
(127,520 posts)at the time of their appointment. They can't be sacked retroactively if the president turns out to have been a criminal. Nobody suggested that wrt Nixon's appointees.
Generic Brad
(14,374 posts)What if, among the documents he stole, was evidence that the 2016 election was rigged and he was only sworn in because the vote was manipulated in key places? He denied collusion so much, we all know in our guts - yeah. He colluded. But it may have gone beyond collusion and he may never have been elected in the first place.
I would think that would nullify everything he touched.
Ocelot II
(127,520 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,426 posts)The only vote that matters is the one in the Electoral College. Unless theres evidence that vote was falsified (extremely unlikely since it isnt a secret ballot; all the votes are public), the election the actual election, not the popular vote that chooses the electors was valid.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,437 posts)The Electoral College voted him in and he was sworn in. Nothing else matters. Constitutionally, he was the legitimately elected President.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,437 posts)There is nothing to discuss. They stay on the bench until they resign, die, or are impeached and removed.
SoCalDavidS
(10,599 posts)And he hasnt even been charged with sedition anyways.
Demsrule86
(71,245 posts)Algernon Moncrieff
(5,961 posts)Emile
(37,992 posts)when their time comes
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Was someone charged with sedition?
ProfessorGAC
(74,661 posts)...the judges stay. There's no cause to impeach because of the criminality of the person who nominated them.
The senate confirmed them; they're judges until they don't wish to continue.
I think we agree the OP is asking a silly question.
Retrograde
(11,295 posts)As much as I hate the idea, Donnie was elected under the terms set out by the Constitution, and his appointees were duly confirmed by the Senate.
Now, if the judges had any self-respect they might resign, but if they had that much self-respect they probably wouldn't have let themselves get rammed through with a bare majority vote in the Senate.