General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnybody else get back on twitter now that the rich man-baby is exiting stage -- good riddance?

Ocelot II
(127,532 posts)and the remedy could be specific performance - that is, the court enforces the contract and orders Musk to buy Twitter as agreed.
Comfortably_Numb
(4,188 posts)Blue Owl
(57,477 posts)Biding his turdly time .
sprinkleeninow
(21,684 posts)Ms. Toad
(37,778 posts)the non-breaching party is not entitled to specific performance.
Ocelot II
(127,532 posts)So Musk might find himself on the hook to buy the company at the agreed-upon price, even though it isn't worth as much as it was when they made the deal - in part because of Musk's own fuckery. That's why Twitter will want to enforce the contract.
Ms. Toad
(37,778 posts)But liquidated damages clauses are generally monetary, not an obligation to perform what the contract required them to do in the first place. To be enforceable, the remedy has to be a reasonable estimate, at the time the parties entered into the contract for the damages (difficult to ascertain at the time of contracting). Specific performance isn't an estimate of the damages.
The decision about specific performance iwill be left to the curt as an equitable remedy if no amount of money would be adequate to compensate the injured party. Seems to me that it is relatively easy to calculate Twitter's loss from the agreed upon price compared to the current price. Twitter keeps its company at a lower value; Musk pays a hefty price for breaching the contract.
Ocelot II
(127,532 posts)to get out of the contract, and thats probably what will happen.
Ms. Toad
(37,778 posts)JI7
(92,728 posts)Wasn't that part of the "deal" ? That if he backed out he would pay a billion .
area51
(12,463 posts)the 1B is if a 3rd party were to block the deal
the contract has a specific performance clause that can force must to buy them comany even if he doesnt want to any more
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000119312522120474/d310843ddefa14a.htm
wnylib
(25,325 posts)the number of fake accounts as a means of bringing down the price? He claims that Twitter did not live up to its part of the bargain so he does not have to live up to his original offer?
FoxNewsSucks
(11,339 posts)never will.
Regardless of owner.
msongs
(72,590 posts)womanofthehills
(10,418 posts)You can design Twitter to your liking.
TDale313
(7,822 posts)I would have if it became clear the deal was actually going to go through. But it started feeling unlikely within a couple days. I am glad it fell through. He should not own Twitter.
womanofthehills
(10,418 posts)Saudi prince, who is major Twitter shareholder, rejects Elon Musk offer to buy company
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/saudi-prince-major-twitter-shareholder-171929382.html
Dr. Shepper
(3,189 posts)Existed. Bliss.
moonshinegnomie
(3,677 posts)it basically says Twitter can force musk to buy them. there is precedence for this in the past in other mergers.
Cha
(314,760 posts)Link to tweet
I never left... I stayed to fight like George Takei.





edbermac
(16,345 posts)I guess thats the Twitter equivalent of the N-word
Dave says
(5,258 posts)Turned in to a MAGA cesspool. Normally its populated with art and left-wing politics. Now its Biden is dirt and stories about women claiming they should have the right to claim a zygote on their taxes (given the absurdity of the SCOTUS Roe decision, they should).
Something is newly amiss over there.
Pete Ross Junior
(404 posts)I speculate the rich man baby is quietly shorting Twitter using an intermediary.