Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,732 posts)
Wed Apr 20, 2022, 01:52 PM Apr 2022

TFG pushes back against New York attorney general's contempt effort

An attorney for Donald Trump hit back Tuesday at an effort by New York Attorney General Letitia James to have the former president held in contempt, claiming he doesn't have documents demanded by James.

James' office asked a state judge on April 7 to issue an order of contempt against Trump, saying he failed to comply with a previous ruling requiring him to turn over documents by March 31 as part of an investigation into his company's financial practices.

Trump attorney Alina Habba said in a filing late Tuesday night that Trump's team attempted to comply with the subpoena, but determined he was not in possession of any of the documents sought by the attorney general. Habba wrote that she informed the attorney general's office that Trump's eponymous company may have the documents being sought, which include personal statements of financial condition, tax audit materials and insurance-related documents.

"While this result may be to the (Attorney General's) dissatisfaction, the fact is that a diligent search was performed and found that (Trump) is not in possession of any of the requested documents," Habba wrote.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-pushes-back-against-new-york-attorney-general-s-contempt-effort/ar-AAWo0vF

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
2. Maybe it got mixed in with the TOP SECRET papers the Republican stole
Wed Apr 20, 2022, 01:59 PM
Apr 2022

from the American people?

C_U_L8R

(49,386 posts)
3. No decent judge will go for that baloney.
Wed Apr 20, 2022, 02:01 PM
Apr 2022

Trump is handing the court the very definition of contempt

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
7. If you would examine court filings that would not remotely be considered a personal attack.
Wed Apr 20, 2022, 02:31 PM
Apr 2022

But the short answer to your question is yes, personal attacks are allowed and occur all the time between attorneys.

UTUSN

(77,795 posts)
8. I take it that changing "personal attack" to "snide snark" would still result in a "yes." Thanks.
Wed Apr 20, 2022, 02:45 PM
Apr 2022
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TFG pushes back against N...