Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,320 posts)
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 12:47 AM Apr 2022

Judge Denies Stacey Abrams the Ability to Raise Funds the Way Brian Kemp Can

A federal judge has declared that Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams cannot raise unlimited campaign funds, despite a state fundraising law that allows her likely opponent, current Gov. Brian Kemp (R), to do so.

State law allows incumbent governors and their challengers from the opposing major political party to form “leadership committees” to raise unlimited funds from supporters in the state. But while incumbents are allowed to set up a committee for such purposes right away, the statute bars Abrams from doing so until after she becomes the Democratic Party’s official nominee, following the state’s primary elections.

Kemp established his leadership committee in July of last year, after signing into law the bill that created the rule in the first place. Abrams will not be allowed to create a similar committee until late May at the earliest.

Lawyers for Abrams had argued in their lawsuit that the elections law gave incumbents an unfair advantage, and that Abrams — who doesn’t have any challengers in the Democratic primary — should be allowed to set up her own leadership committee now as the presumptive nominee, with the same rules applied to it that Kemp has.

Read more: https://truthout.org/articles/judge-denies-stacey-abrams-the-ability-to-raise-funds-the-way-brian-kemp-can/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Fiendish Thingy

(21,015 posts)
1. Didn't Citizens United confirm that money is speech and can't be restricted?
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 12:49 AM
Apr 2022

Seems that, under that ruling, this is a first amendment issue.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. One big positive is that Abrams is running a great ad now with her and an INDEPENDENT
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 12:55 AM
Apr 2022

voter that is killer.

That law sucks, but at this point we need to move on and help fund these kinds of ads. (Sorry, but I can’t find a link, but just saw Abrams’ ad during Colbert.)

tirebiter

(2,646 posts)
5. Raise the money now in PACs that hold it for the meantime
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 01:06 AM
Apr 2022

Then transfer it to PACs recognized by the state when she gets the nod. Her organization has experienced money raisers. If that wouldn’t work they got paid to find out what will.

wnylib

(25,339 posts)
6. So, people outside of Georgia can
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 01:26 AM
Apr 2022

start putting aside money to donate as soon as she is able to receive it.

keopeli

(3,582 posts)
8. The judge is an Obama appointee. Makes me wonder what gives. The law sounds unconstitutional.
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 01:50 AM
Apr 2022
 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
9. the way to make up for that and more is to stop ignoring that 14 kemp radio stations are
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 01:51 AM
Apr 2022

dependent on her supporters at 3 Ga universities continuing to ignore that their own schools are supporting kemp - by broadcasting sports on them

from fakenewsradio.org GEORGIA 14 Georgia 7, Georgia Tech 5, Georgia Southern 2

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Denies Stacey Abram...