Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(52,783 posts)
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 05:36 AM Mar 2022

INTERVIEW: Would the EU defend Sweden if it was attacked?

Could the EU's mutual defence clause, which says member states will help each other if one is attacked, provide extra security for Sweden?

https://www.thelocal.se/20220309/explained-would-the-eu-defend-sweden-if-it-was-attacked/



Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has reignited Sweden’s long-running debate about its own defence, and in particular whether it should join Nato. Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson has rejected joining the transatlantic alliance, but has written to EU leaders along with her Finnish counterpart to remind them of the bloc’s mutual defence clause, which says member states will come to each others’ aid “with all possible means” if one of them is attacked. Sweden and Finland are close partners of Nato, but as non-members they can’t count on Nato intervening militarily if attacked, as they aren’t covered by the alliance’s Article 5 guarantee.





Andersson this week ruled out joining Nato, saying that an application to join “would destabilise this part of Europe even further.” But does the EU’s mutual defence clause really provide Sweden with a cast-iron guarantee? Björn Fägersten, head of the Europe program at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs, says there are some key differences between the EU’s and Nato’s guarantees.

The Local: Does the EU’s mutual defence clause have a similar effect to Nato’s Article 5?

Björn Fägersten: In a purely legal sense they are equivalent – in some ways the EU is a bit sharper. But on the other hand, the EU’s clause has a sub-clause that makes clear that it doesn’t affect member states’ individual choices on security policy, for instance for those countries that are neutral.

A key difference between the EU and Nato is that the EU has no real apparatus. Nato has a joint military headquarters, SHAPE, but the EU doesn’t have an equivalent. Within the EU there are also expectations that Nato will be at the centre of European planning – most EU countries are members. In the EU’s Global Strategy from 2016 it is made clear that Nato is the cornerstone of the EU’s defence.

snip










Sweden says it built a Russian fighter jet killer — and stealth is totally irrelevant

https://archive.ph/Jou88#selection-1659.0-1659.85










3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
INTERVIEW: Would the EU defend Sweden if it was attacked? (Original Post) Celerity Mar 2022 OP
I am little surprised they decided not to join dsc Mar 2022 #1
All this Russian incompetence on display, I'm thinking it could happen the other way ck4829 Mar 2022 #2
With the Russian's performance in Ukraine I don't doc03 Mar 2022 #3

doc03

(38,571 posts)
3. With the Russian's performance in Ukraine I don't
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 09:14 AM
Mar 2022

think anyone has to worry much about Russia. Providing they don't use nukes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»INTERVIEW: Would the EU d...