General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
OnDoutside
(20,859 posts)going to expect he's attention seeking as usual.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)AOC is, as usual, completely and totally correct.
OnDoutside
(20,859 posts)It's like he loves fucking with Democrats to extract concessions. Consequently my consistent attitude with Manchin is to wait and see which way he actually votes before coming to a judgement on him.
UCmeNdc
(9,654 posts)So far her instincts have been right.
OnDoutside
(20,859 posts)jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)Thus by use of her preternatural ability to discern which ways up vs down she sees through the charade of fuddy-duddyness which cloaks our government. A valuable asset is our AOC. Ignore her wisdom at your peril.
radius777
(3,921 posts)the future belongs to Dems like her who fight for the real base of the Dem party. It's not about leftist vs centrist, but about who will fight when it counts. Remember there are many centrist Dems not standing in the way like Manchin/Sinema do. You rarely hear about Tester or Hickenlooper or many others. It's just these two FoxNews Dems who want attention ... please me please me please me .. and think they are more powerful than the president we the people elected with 81 million votes Joe Biden.
Glaisne
(605 posts)So why bring it to the floor to vote if it won't pass? There won't be a vote.
OnDoutside
(20,859 posts)Paladin
(31,826 posts)
madaboutharry
(42,018 posts)Statements like this accomplish nothing.
I could find some respect for her if she actually offered ideas on how to move forward.
Autumn
(48,491 posts)madaboutharry
(42,018 posts)They accomplish nothing, even if there is truth in it.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)Autumn
(48,491 posts)

Tribetime
(6,905 posts)To me that's the same argument as we cannot talk about a school shooting right after the shooting that would politicize to me it's kind of the same response.. if not now then when is the right time
quakerboy
(14,587 posts)And assume the next thing will work out all peachy keen, regardless of what the past might teach us.
Polybius
(21,016 posts)I remember arguing with a poster who was kinda nasty about the Virginia elections. He basically said that I was a fool for believing polls that Glenn Youngkin was gonna win, and how I was a slave to fake news designed to make Democrats look bad. He even sarcastically said "thank you for your concern." I went in a few days later to remind him. No reply, no apology.
Walleye
(42,900 posts)jalan48
(14,914 posts)Autumn
(48,491 posts)jalan48
(14,914 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)Nothing says He'd have voted on it if it was presented as the entire bill either.
Why would he have voted on it then if he STILL won't?
Not sure what she's claiming credit for.
Manchin didn't want the BBB in the 1st place.
But thanks for refusing to vote yes on the one thing that was certain, and we now have. BIF.
But lets just forget that anymore.
New spin day.
Manchin didn't want BBB then & he doesn't want iit now.
THAT's why BIF was voted on alone. The Senate had already approved that part.
MANCHIN WOULDN'T HAVE VOTED FOR EITHER IF THE WHOLE PACKAGE WOULD HAVE BEEN SENT TOGETHER.
I have no idea why she's claiming credit for any of this.
Manchin wasn't going to vote for BBB ever. Together with BIF or not.
🙄
TheFarseer
(9,691 posts)Next time we are negotiating something, dont give Manchin everything he wants and then try to negotiate. Its kind of too late to go forward on Bbb.
comradebillyboy
(10,899 posts)Cha
(315,188 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Youre better than just a cheerleader
Diablo del sol
(424 posts)She is doing what she feels is right for her constituents and country.
There is no evidence that she takes money or her vote can be bought.
She negotiated down from original requests
She was then told things needed to be broken up to keep two Senators happy.
Response was, her and her squad were being unrealistic and selfish
Manchin runs to the enemy to backstab the President and all Democrats
She responds and it is I told you so and unhelpful
Is that correct?
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Politicub
(12,316 posts)Shes telling the truth: demanding that the senate pass the BBB bill was the only leverage that progressives had. We squandered it.
AOC is right. Manchin is not trustworthy, and he rubs his Maserati-propelled ass in our faces with his Fox News circle-jerk tour.
Alpeduez21
(1,970 posts)And brought nothing to the table?!?!?! SMH 🤦♂️
TexasTowelie
(123,770 posts)Her statement may come back to haunt her.
lame54
(38,688 posts)Is reserved for when something actually happens
Joe Manchin might have gone on Fox and rat-fucked us out of both bills
malaise
(290,392 posts)
pecosbob
(8,143 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)voted like the Squad, Manchin would be doing exactly what he is doing now, and we would have no infrastructure bill passed at all. The entire Squad has one one thousanth of the power Manchin has now. Sorry, but that's the numerical reality. And he knows it and doesn't give a fuck what the Squad does.
comradebillyboy
(10,899 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)So here is where we stop.
They spent the entire summer kicking the old can down the road & stalling it out.
Anything to tank Biden's popularity.
Thats what this shitshow is really about.
.
Cha
(315,188 posts)from me.
Nixie
(17,870 posts)If anything, they just tee'd him up. What a shame.
pwb
(12,384 posts)Now he looks like a fool. He is a puke for sure. He lies.
Walleye
(42,900 posts)monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)Is getting a real workout in this thread without a hint of irony:
Link to tweet
?t=mVnUo4HHhIoDiKbN1m-ffQ&s=19
LowerManhattanite
(2,433 posts)The we have to give him a chance brigade is now fully in on the well, what did you expect sh*t.
Joe Lieberman is somewhere grinning his funhouse sign grin over this sh*t.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Polybius
(21,016 posts)I don't think she would have voted against it if her vote mattered.
George II
(67,782 posts)Polybius
(21,016 posts)I wish I did know. It's just what I think. I could be wrong
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)As claiming Schumer voted against the Freedom to Vote Act because he was against voting rights
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1171/vote_117_1_00420.htm
Everybody knows he voted against it so that he can vote on it later. Just like the Squad did for both the BIF and the BBB.
George II
(67,782 posts)First, Schumer didn't vote AGAINST the Freedom to Vote Act, he voted against CLOTURE. Title of the vote:
Question: On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed (Motion to Invoke Cloture: Motion to Proceed to S. 2747 )
At first he DID vote for cloture, but at the last minute changed his vote to Nay when it was clear cloture wouldn't have been invoked. If he voted for cloture and it failed, he couldn't re-introduce the bill at a later date. Senate Majority Leaders have been doing this for decades.
If you look through all the votes this session, you'll find a number of other cloture votes for which he voted Nay. It's what they do.
On the other hand, the House doesn't hold cloture votes - they only vote for bills once and for all in the session. And for those Democrats who voted Nay on the BIF, it was one and done. No reruns like in the Senate where cloture is involved.
Plus, despite what you said above ("Just like the Squad did for both the BIF and the BBB" ), all those who voted Nay on BIF in the House voted Yea on BBB.
https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2021/roll385.xml
However, I agree with what you gloriously stated the other day, "Read it. Learn it. Live it."
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16152347
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)You've already lost the argument.
George II
(67,782 posts)...the bill, but he didn't. He voted against cloture. I hope you appreciate the difference now.
It's not an "argument", it's a statement of fact and procedure.
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)You know perfectly well the Squad was not against BIF in itself, but continue to insinuate that falsehood constantly, which would be like claiming Chuck Schumer is against voting rights.
George II
(67,782 posts)wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)See how "distinctions without differences" work?
George II
(67,782 posts)wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)The House voted for BIF, it passed
The Senate voted for BIF, it passed
The House voted for BBB, it passed
The Senate hasn't voted on BBB yet
So who voted against things they support?
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)Right?
George II
(67,782 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,319 posts)She is not a senate material, maybe after she gets more experience in congress if she is willing to learn from those who get stuff done.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)The Freedumb Caucus is also a "never compromise" group.
I dont know when it became a requirement that multiple bills have to pass together for anything to be passed.