Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In It to Win It

(11,631 posts) Wed Apr 28, 2021, 10:16 PM Apr 2021

I had absolutely no idea President Biden was giving an address to Congress today

...and I'm not kidding about that.

But it's cool. I'm sure everything went well. I trust Joe!

I hear it was phenomenal!

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I had absolutely no idea President Biden was giving an address to Congress today (Original Post) In It to Win It Apr 2021 OP

No one yelled "Liar!" Feces ceasefire apparently. StClone Apr 2021 #1

Maybe it gets fewer pre-event headlines without the "State of the Union" moniker... RockRaven Apr 2021 #2

It will be on the White House channel on You Tube yellowdogintexas Apr 2021 #3

StClone

(11,869 posts)

1. No one yelled "Liar!" Feces ceasefire apparently.

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Wed Apr 28, 2021, 10:26 PM

Apr 2021

RockRaven

(18,143 posts)

2. Maybe it gets fewer pre-event headlines without the "State of the Union" moniker...

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Wed Apr 28, 2021, 10:32 PM

Apr 2021

For arcane and unimportant reasons, the one right after the election isn't officially a SOTU, but the other 3 years it is.

Also Biden isn't a whiney baby drama-seeking boor so the media didn't know how to hype it with tension like they did with the former guy. And tension/anxiety/etc is the news media's main way of operating.

yellowdogintexas

(23,483 posts)

3. It will be on the White House channel on You Tube

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Wed Apr 28, 2021, 10:39 PM

Apr 2021

I watched it live there

Reply to this discussion