Epic Elie Mystal: Apply The Laws We Already Have To White People! 'Tastes Just Like Chicken!'

[babylonsister]

https://crooksandliars.com/2021/01/Epic-Elie-Mystal-Apply-Law-White-People-Tastes-Like-Chicken


1/09/21 1:20pm
Epic Elie Mystal: Apply The Laws We Already Have To White People! 'Tastes Just Like Chicken!'
Merrick Garland's DOJ doesn't need new laws to properly focus on domestic terrorism. Just prosecute white people with the ones we already have!
By NewsHound Ellen


Elie Mystal, justice correspondent for The Nation, threw down the gauntlet for Biden’s designated attorney general, Merrick Garland.

MYSTAL: There are four attorney generals in history who gave a damn about Black lives and about Black justice. Bobby Kennedy, Janet Reno, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch. That's the list. Edwin Meese was not out here trying to ride or die for Black lives, alright? So, what we have is the department that historically has failed in its mission and simply trying to go back to that failure is not enough, right? I think Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch did good jobs. I think Janet Reno did a good job. But we can do better than even what they were able to accomplish. There are a number of things through executive order, through consent decrees, through an entirely different level of holding police accountable that can be done through the DOJ. And I just hope Garland is up to the task. His record doesn’t necessarily suggest that he is.

The New York Times, when he was nominated to the Supreme Court, The New York TImes did an analysis. In 10 of 14 cases where police criminality or misconduct were on the line. Merrick Garland sided with law enforcement, in 10 of those 14 cases, while he was a district court judge. That's not great, alright? So maybe he’s evolved. Maybe he's ready to reach a higher level. People do change and improve. But that's what Merrick Garland has to do: change and improve. And bring the DOJ to a new level of justice and fairness.

Mystal praised some of Biden’s other picks for the DOJ. But he also called for greater enforcement of the current laws against domestic terrorism, especially right-wing terrorism or white nationalist terrorism.

MYSTAL: Domestic terrorism is our number one threat but I just want to add we do not need new laws to deal with it, alright? We do not need new federal legislation, we do not need a new surveillance state.

Insurrection is already a crime, alright? Conspiracy to commit crimes are already crimes. Felony murder is already a crime. What we need to do is not have a new surveillance state commission. What we need is to take the laws we already have and apply them to white people, for like once. Let's try it. Tastes just like chicken. But take the laws we've got and apply them to white people and see what happens because I think that's the way forward, not with new laws and new regimes and new surveillance.

This is how we make change and improvement: by keeping up the pressure on elected officials. Especially when we’re about to have a new administration that’s inclined to listen.

[ananda]

1. Doesn't everyone with half a brain already know this?

If I do, I'm sure everyone in Biden's admin knows it.

[babylonsister]

2. Apparently not...

Nearly 50 House members have signed on to a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the House leadership seeking an independent commission to investigate the security failures in Wednesday's riot at the Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump.

https://lasvegassun.com/news/2021/jan/09/the-latest-senator-wants-crime-scene-evidence-pres/

[enough]

3. No. NT

[WhiskeyGrinder]

6. So why is Biden pushing for new domestic terrorism laws?

[ananda]

8. Got me. Why?

???

[uponit7771]

9. Currently the domestic online terrorist groups can't be monitored like the foreign ones. The risk ..

... is another Red Don or close who'll treat BLM like the FBI tried to do recently and call them a domestic terrorist group too and even go as far as the ACLU.

They need TIGHT ... TIGHT parameters around the dt laws or the white supremacist will include any group they don't like

[Laxman]

4. I Susupect....

that the reason the Justice Department is calling the terrorist attack on the Capitol "The First Amendment Demonstrations of January 6, 2021" (talk about euphomisms) is to avoid equal application of the law. If not, wouldn't the Patriot Act be in play?

[Hermit-The-Prog]

7. Looks like it's still Barr's Dirt Services instead of DoJ. The 1st Am. does not protect insurrection

[TigressDem]

5. While I agree we need to use the laws we have, the elephant in the US is White Supremacy Violence

We need to DEFINE all groups that would commit violence on fellow US citizens and even upon the elected US leaders ad DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

USE the laws on the books, don't put cameras up everyone's ass, but write it up. THIS SHIT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

The US needs to admit that White people aren't the ONLY PEOPLE that matter.

BLACK LIVES, BROWN LIVES, every color of the RAINBOW of LIVES DO MATTER.

[uponit7771]

10. ***WRONG*** We do NOT have laws that allow the monitoring of domestic terrorist groups like the

... foreign ones.

The change in laws is not in the prosecution afterwards its in the monitoring right now

We can go ... WAY FURTHER ... in monitoring regular ISIS than Vanilla ISIS

[2naSalit]

11. +1

[DeminPennswoods]

12. Don't know much about Garland's record on the bench,

but being a judge is different from being a prosecutor.