General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFollowing a Trump appeal, PA court rules that observers must be allowed to "closely observe" count
Link to tweet

NoMoreRepugs
(11,684 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)Their intent is to disrupt. Not actually observe. 🙄
BusyBeingBest
(9,173 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)Not that they won't try.
uponit7771
(93,305 posts)PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)yes, poll watchers have to be certified but not sure if it's by the county or by the party.
struggle4progress
(124,974 posts)RainCaster
(13,209 posts)As close to the screen as they like. While holding their guns.
onethatcares
(16,924 posts)drumps poll watchers run out of fingers and toes??
rzemanfl
(30,919 posts)Squinch
(57,487 posts)rzemanfl
(30,919 posts)Squinch
(57,487 posts)
Laelth
(32,017 posts)I havent read the opinion, but I hope the Court gave some guidance about what it means by closely and how the Courts definition of closely differs from the procedures currently being implemented by the duly-elected and appointed officers of the executive branch of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Absent such guidance, the Court is merely throwing fuel on a fire while accomplishing nothing constructive.
-Laelth
Brother Buzz
(39,200 posts)New from @mitchellreports: the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has overruled the Commonwealth Court ruling favoring the Trump campaign on watching the mail-in ballot count in Philadelphia. The mail-in counting is resuming.
Things are fluid, Baby! Looks like the orange anus' camp is awash in santorum.